Hi Oscar, Am Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:36:22 +0200, schrieb Oscar van Vliet: > Dear Sophie, > > I think the reason why OOo 2 is not on the table at NeoOffice until > probably the end of the year was made obvious by yesterday's other > thread about capitals not working: it is not stable and feature > complete enough yet to use a base. We are aiming at Mac end users, who > are notoriously averse to tinkering.
Yes but did you read any further? :-) NeoOffice/J (1.1final) under MacOS X Tiger (10.4.1) So the bug is in NO/J final 1.1. too. So much about feature completeness for NO/J. I know it is much easier to read only what one wants to read and to blame OOo for every bug that occures in NO/J then do something and help OOo fixing the bug. I appreciate the hard work of Ed and Patrick in giving OOo a native GUI and I also appreciate the code donation Patrick made but what I cannot see is that they help getting OOo 2.0 stable. Would it be so hard for Patrick or Ed to help us adopting his fixes to OOo 2.0 tree and not only donate the code? This would be real teamwork and not only donate the code, let us OOo porters do the work, "steal" the code when porting to 2.0 is done, wrap NO/J around it, use GPL so that the code is useless for OOo, wait till OOo 2.x or 3.x arrives, again give back some code, again don't do anything in porting it and so on. Ed and Patrick in addition would benefit from this kind of teamwork. The sooner OOo 2.0 X11 for Mac OS X is stable, the sooner could they wrap NO/J around it. Regards, Eric Hoch -- ## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterstützung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
