Christian Lohmaier, 12-01-2007 08:58:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:56:42AM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote:
To avoid confusion, and to be constructive, not to reinventing a wheel, and
hope my e-mails are good for everyone,
I decided to license my e-mails at [email protected] are same as wiki's one
at OOo.
This is currently LGPL.
No - wiki stuff is not currently LGPL. And I don't know what you make
think so.
Furthermore: A code-license like LGPL is absolutely not adequate for
documentation as found on the wiki.
If you really insinst on being mentioned as author and similar on
everything you wrote, I ask you to not add your stuff to the wiki, but
to use the regular CVS pages instead.
Wiki = collaborative editing doesn't fit well with an author wanting to
have his/her contribution mentioned everytime.
You don't loose copyright just because anybody else modified some parts
of your posts.
It is now stated in the copyright info for the wiki:
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights>
We have GNU Free Documentation License for this:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License>
and I agree it's more suitable than LGPL for documentation.
But I think the council should discuss this kind of thing, it's outside
the scope of this project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
