Hi *, 
cc Louis,

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:59:17PM -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
> [...] 
> It is now stated in the copyright info for the wiki:
> <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights>

LGPL is complete crap for Documentation. And I absolutely don't know why
Louis modified the wiki page to add a stupid license there.
> 
> We have GNU Free Documentation License for this: 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License>

No. "We" have PDL for documentation. 

> and I agree it's more suitable than LGPL for documentation.
> 
> But I think the council should discuss this kind of thing, it's outside 
> the scope of this project.

If the LGPL is authoritative license decision, then I'll remove all the
stuff I added there.

ciao
Christian
-- 
NP: L'Amort - Dish Water
                           Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to