Hi all,
cc Louis and Stefan
Christian Lohmaier, 12-01-2007 17:16:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:59:17PM -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
[...]
It is now stated in the copyright info for the wiki:
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights>
LGPL is complete crap for Documentation. And I absolutely don't know why
Louis modified the wiki page to add a stupid license there.
We have GNU Free Documentation License for this:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License>
No. "We" have PDL for documentation.
Sorry for the 'we', it was general, not related to OpenOffice.org. I
meant 'There exist'.
I know the license page tell PDL is the default for documents and LGPL
is the default for code and that there are only a few minor exceptions.
and I agree it's more suitable than LGPL for documentation.
But I think the council should discuss this kind of thing, it's outside
the scope of this project.
If the LGPL is authoritative license decision, then I'll remove all the
stuff I added there.
I don't believe it's a authoritative decision.
First: I told we hadn't a clear statment about the licenses which could
be used in the wiki.
Second: Louis created a text about the license (mentioning LGPL)
Third: Stefan didn't questioned it in his reply
Then Louis put it on the wiki's copyright page.
I don't think there is any motive to not allow PDL content under the wiki.
I think Louis forgot it.
About LGPL vs domain free vs whatever, I would like to know if it was
defined in some place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
