Hi Christian,
The questions you asked are the same for me, and like you I wonder
*how*, what has been added some month ago can suddenly be considered
under another license
Le 12 janv. 07 à 21:18, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi *,
cc Louis,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:59:17PM -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
[...]
It is now stated in the copyright info for the wiki:
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/
OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights>
LGPL is complete crap for Documentation. And I absolutely don't
know why
Louis modified the wiki page to add a stupid license there.
I wonder too ?
Maybe some other project is interested or something ...
We have GNU Free Documentation License for this:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License>
No. "We" have PDL for documentation.
+1 : I completely agree with you
and I agree it's more suitable than LGPL for documentation.
But I think the council should discuss this kind of thing, it's
outside
the scope of this project.
If the LGPL is authoritative license decision, then I'll remove all
the
stuff I added there.
I propose we discuss that point on Mac meeting (in less than an hour ).
Regards,
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
