+1 for shipping it!
I tested failover_soak ( in cpp/src/tests ) in a 1 M message cluster failover test against a 4-cluster. This test involved about 20 broker-kills. It was happy. ( No dropped messages. ) I also used the first version of Shackleton ( a testing tool I'm working on ) to generate and run 1080 separate tests of messaging topology. i.e. different numbers of queues, receivers per queue, routing keys per queue, and senders per key. All the Shackleton tests passed -- the number of messages at each receiver were as predicted. Also, in all tests with multiple receivers per queue, allocation fairness was reasonable -- average disparity across all tests of 0.9%, maximum disparity of 10%. So I say, ship it! On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:36 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > I've uploaded qpid-0.6rc6 and I think that we are ready for a vote > immediately: > > Thanks to Rajith the files that were in violation of the Apache rules on > licenses now have license texts. > > The only differences between rc6 and rc5 are non-functional, so if you > tested rc5 at all and you voted +1, you should have every reason to vote > +1 again! > > Therefore I'd like to call for a vote to release this release candidate > (0.6rc6) "as is" relabelled as 0.6. In other words the identical source > bits as rc6 except changing the name. > > You should find qpid-0.6rc6 at: > http://qpid.apache.org/dist/qpid-0.6rc6 > > The subversion revision is: 909632 > ( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.6-release/qpid ) > > The rules for a release vote are: > ( http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes ) > > * Simple majority required. > * No veto votes > * At least 3 + votes. > > I propose that we consider all commiter votes not just "binding" PMC > votes. > > I also propose to run the vote until Tue 2 Mar 2010. At that point I > will total the votes. > > Please vote in a message replying to this one to make it easier to find > the votes. > > It goes without saying (well clearly not) that if you vote yes you > should have a reason to think that the release is good enough - I'd > suggest downloading whatever you know most about and trying it. > > Thanks > > Andrew > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
