> -----Original Message----- > From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 7:20 AM > To: dev@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: Vote for 0.6 Release (Really) > ... > > On the .csproj files, I would guess that they probably do need a > > licence, and if most of them already include it then it > seems sensible > > to do the rest and finish the job. > > Seems sensible. Is someone willing to volunteer to do that?
Who's working on the .NET client these days? Has it been tested? > Following > Rajiths comments I'm not sure what the right approach is. There are > certainly other csproj files with the license in at the top > of the file - do these cause problems for MSVC? No, as long as the inserted XML doesn't step on a special marker char which may be at the very start of the file. I checked a few of the dotnet csproj files and they didn't have that marker anyway, so there should be no problem dropping the license into an XML comment. Just make sure to try a build before committing and things should be fine. -Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
