I believe this means we must fix these and roll another RC before we can proceed with a vote, correct?
On the .csproj files, I would guess that they probably do need a licence, and if most of them already include it then it seems sensible to do the rest and finish the job. Robbie On 26 February 2010 15:25, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > > It looks fine to me (c++ tests and python tests against the c++ broker run, > python management tools run ok). Running RAT against it also looks ok except > for ruby/ext/sasl/extconf.rb. That file is tiny, but it is code and it > doesn't have the license at the top. > > (There are some csproj files in the 0-10 dotnet client that also don't have > this, e.g. dotnet/client-010/client/Client.csproj, but these may not be > required?) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
