Carlos,

Thanks for clarification :) That's sounds good! :)

2018-03-06 12:31 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:

> Hi Piotr,
>
> for compiler I expect to solve (if I can, since is not my conformt zone and
> I need to see what can I do) bugs in CSS.
> Don't see anything that not should go directly to develop since should be
> commits solving concrete issues (like #25, and #26)
>
> In the other hand, my work will be in 3 concrete projects that are isolated
> from the rest (Jewel, JewelTheme, and JewelExample)
> those projects are still "incubating", so deserves a branch and the work
> will be there, although right now are safe, but I think it should not be in
> the 0.9.2 release (not like compiler bugs or enhancements)
>
> In the case this change in the future, we can adapt to the change, but I
> think is not good to put things before it happens, and for me is more quick
> not to need to update 3 branches against develop when only one is needed.
>
>
>
>
> 2018-03-06 12:05 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Are you saying that you will be working using develop in case of
> compiler,
> > but in case of asjs on the separate new branch ?
> >
> > Thanks, Piotr
> >
> > 2018-03-06 11:58 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > just let you know that I made this refactor and remove old branches.
> > > I merged compiler changes in develop, since I think are not specific of
> > > Jewel.
> > > So, for the moment I'll use only one branch in asjs until I need more
> > > branches.
> > > If for example, I fix a compiler problem in CSS I'll commit to develop
> > > since normaly it would be a bug and not part of something new
> > > This is all good to ease the work since the refactor now was simple and
> > > maybe later could be a problem
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-03-02 23:52 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > thanks! :), don't worry I can wait for you to come, I can still be
> > > > preparing the "scenario" so when you come is all more easy to
> > collaborate
> > > > :).
> > > >
> > > > Regarding names and namespace, I'm a great advocate that these things
> > > > matters, I know people can use different prefixes if they want, but
> in
> > > the
> > > > end, 99% of the people will use what we put on place. The same as
> > people
> > > > using spark in flex ends writing <s:Button/>.
> > > >
> > > > but Anyway, I want to know that these change was ok with you all, and
> > as
> > > > well notify before making changes suddenly in git about this.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2018-03-02 20:50 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Carlos,
> > > >>
> > > >> First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something
> awesome
> > > and
> > > >> I
> > > >> can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that.
> User
> > > can
> > > >> have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have
> > > this
> > > >> one:
> > > >>
> > > >> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could
> > > also
> > > >> change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in
> my
> > > >> app.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >> 2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a
> > > branch, I
> > > >> > think all this work will no affect that.
> > > >> > My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend
> make
> > > the
> > > >> > renaming, but all in the branch.
> > > >> > Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days,
> we
> > > can
> > > >> > merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that
> > > time I
> > > >> > could ask you and see what we can't do
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Sounds ok to me.  Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or
> the
> > > >> next
> > > >> > > release?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > -Alex
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of
> Carlos
> > > >> > Rovira"
> > > >> > > <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >Hi,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start
> making
> > > the
> > > >> > real
> > > >> > > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main
> concept
> > > for
> > > >> > > >vivid,
> > > >> > > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking
> > and
> > > >> make
> > > >> > > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this
> UI
> > > set
> > > >> > > >could
> > > >> > > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a
> crown
> > > >> (like
> > > >> > > >the
> > > >> > > >one in our Royale logo).
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for
> example
> > > >> we'll
> > > >> > be
> > > >> > > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript,
> but
> > > more
> > > >> > > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side"
> from
> > > the
> > > >> > code
> > > >> > > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and
> all
> > > the
> > > >> > > >things that wire all together are as well important so people
> > know
> > > we
> > > >> > work
> > > >> > > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Let me know what do you think about it
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Thanks!
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >--
> > > >> > > >Carlos Rovira
> > > >> > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > >> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> > > >> > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> > > >> > > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> > > >> > > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > >> > > 7C636556155398287246&s
> > > >> > > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%
> > > 2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Carlos Rovira
> > > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >>
> > > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to