Understand, but how would you do that if you will have to in your app ? wt., 27 sie 2019 o 13:49 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Ok Piotr, > > now I understand. I'm not doing browser check in our app since our client > knows the versions we support and the tablets their workforce use is > controlled. > We can do as well some checking logic to plug in royale, but my email was > more about giving flexibility to users that want to do that or output any > other js or html code they want. Browser checking is just one of them. > > Thanks! > > > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:46, Piotr Zarzycki (< > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > Carlos, > > > > I don't refer to the compiler. As you can see in the code it is an > attempt > > of checking whether application is compatible with web browser. [1] Are > you > > doing that in your app ? > > > > If (browserversion < 44) > > { > > display something to the user > > } > > > > If not how would you do that ? > > > > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets/jewel.html > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 10:43 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > napisał(a): > > > > > Hi Piotr, sorry but I don't catch what you're trying to say. Sorry :? > > > Anyway my proposal could not be the right one. Maybe others could bring > > > other one that works better. > > > The problem is that compiler output is currently very restrictive, and > > > doing some little changes there users > > > could extend their available options in custom html templates. > > > > > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:37, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > > > Do you check in your application browser compatibility with Jewel ? > How > > > > would you do this if you would like to display something if browser > is > > > not > > > > compatible ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 10:34 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > > > Searching in royale-compiler, that line seems to be generated in > > > > > MXMLRoyalePublisher.java > > > > > line 917 on getTemplateBody method > > > > > > > > > > maybe the actual way compiler deal with this is a bit restricted, > and > > > we > > > > > can update that part including the <script> tags in the html > template > > > and > > > > > making ${body} only outputs "new App.start();", so people could > > switch > > > to > > > > > its own "htmlTemplate" changing that to something like this: > > > > > > > > > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > > > > royaleCompatibility = new RoyaleCompatibility(); > > > > > if (royaleCompatibility.isCompatible) { > > > > > ${body} > > > > > } else { > > > > > royaleCompatibility.displayIncompatibilityText(); > > > > > } > > > > > </script> > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:10, Chris Velevitch (< > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > Where is the value of "${body}" defined? When I build a > javascript > > > app, > > > > > the > > > > > > following code is inserted there:- > > > > > > > > > > > > <script> > > > > > > new MyApp().start(); > > > > > > </script> > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to be able to insert additional code there like:- > > > > > > > > > > > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > > > > > royaleCompatibility = new RoyaleCompatibility(); > > > > > > if (royaleCompatibility.isCompatible) { > > > > > > new MyApp().start(); > > > > > > } else { > > > > > > royaleCompatibility.displayIncompatibilityText(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > </script> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do I do that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
