>
> Even if I find a
> way to integrate as a Royale code I'll do that too to get more control at
> level code, instead of having it just as template solution.


>

I'm not entirely get that part, are you saying that you would prefer have
solution inside Royale which ? This is what you mean in above sentence ?

wt., 27 sie 2019 o 14:39 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> I think, I'll search for some JS library that could fit that and if not go
> for some custom script like the one Chris is implementing. Even if I find a
> way to integrate as a Royale code I'll do that too to get more control at
> level code, instead of having it just as template solution.
>
> El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 14:03, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> [email protected]>) escribió:
>
> > Assume that you have list of compatible web browsers and you need to
> > display for the user info that - hey your browser is incompatible.
> >
> > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 14:02 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Understand, but how would you do that if you will have to in your app ?
> > >
> > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 13:49 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > >> Ok Piotr,
> > >>
> > >> now I understand. I'm not doing browser check in our app since our
> > client
> > >> knows the versions we support and the tablets their workforce use is
> > >> controlled.
> > >> We can do as well some checking logic to plug in royale, but my email
> > was
> > >> more about giving flexibility to users that want to do that or output
> > any
> > >> other js or html code they want. Browser checking is just one of them.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> [email protected]>) escribió:
> > >>
> > >> > Carlos,
> > >> >
> > >> > I don't refer to the compiler. As you can see in the code it is an
> > >> attempt
> > >> > of checking whether application is compatible with web browser. [1]
> > Are
> > >> you
> > >> > doing that in your app ?
> > >> >
> > >> > If (browserversion < 44)
> > >> > {
> > >> >    display something to the user
> > >> > }
> > >> >
> > >> > If not how would you do that ?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets/jewel.html
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Piotr
> > >> >
> > >> > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 10:43 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> > >> > napisał(a):
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Piotr, sorry but I don't catch what you're trying to say. Sorry
> > :?
> > >> > > Anyway my proposal could not be the right one. Maybe others could
> > >> bring
> > >> > > other one that works better.
> > >> > > The problem is that compiler output is currently very restrictive,
> > and
> > >> > > doing some little changes there users
> > >> > > could extend their available options in custom html templates.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:37, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> > > [email protected]>) escribió:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Carlos,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Do you check in your application browser compatibility with
> Jewel
> > ?
> > >> How
> > >> > > > would you do this if you would like to display something if
> > browser
> > >> is
> > >> > > not
> > >> > > > compatible ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Piotr
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 10:34 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]
> >
> > >> > > > napisał(a):
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi Chris,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Searching in royale-compiler, that line seems to be generated
> in
> > >> > > > > MXMLRoyalePublisher.java
> > >> > > > > line 917 on getTemplateBody method
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > maybe the actual way compiler deal with this is a bit
> > restricted,
> > >> and
> > >> > > we
> > >> > > > > can update that part including the <script> tags in the html
> > >> template
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > > making ${body} only outputs "new App.start();", so people
> could
> > >> > switch
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > > its own "htmlTemplate" changing that to something like this:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > <script type="text/javascript">
> > >> > > > >    royaleCompatibility = new RoyaleCompatibility();
> > >> > > > >    if (royaleCompatibility.isCompatible) {
> > >> > > > >        ${body}
> > >> > > > >    } else {
> > >> > > > >        royaleCompatibility.displayIncompatibilityText();
> > >> > > > >    }
> > >> > > > > </script>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thoughts?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Carlos
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:10, Chris Velevitch (<
> > >> > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Where is the value of "${body}" defined? When I build a
> > >> javascript
> > >> > > app,
> > >> > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > following code is inserted there:-
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >    <script>
> > >> > > > > >           new MyApp().start();
> > >> > > > > >    </script>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I want to be able to insert additional code there like:-
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > <script type="text/javascript">
> > >> > > > > >    royaleCompatibility = new RoyaleCompatibility();
> > >> > > > > >    if (royaleCompatibility.isCompatible) {
> > >> > > > > >        new MyApp().start();
> > >> > > > > >    } else {
> > >> > > > > >        royaleCompatibility.displayIncompatibilityText();
> > >> > > > > >    }
> > >> > > > > > </script>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > How do I do that?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > >> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >> >
> > >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Carlos Rovira
> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to