Hi Chris, ua-parser-js seems very complete. I'll have into account for my own projects :). Thanks for sharing.
El mié., 28 ago. 2019 a las 5:59, Chris Velevitch (< [email protected]>) escribió: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 16:34, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > maybe the actual way compiler deal with this is a bit restricted, and we > > can update that part including the <script> tags in the html template and > > making ${body} only outputs "new App.start();", so people could switch to > > its own "htmlTemplate" > > > Sounds like a good long term solution. Josh's suggestion also good as long > as you remember or know the main class name of the app in order to start it > in the customised HTML template. > > As for compatibility testing, writing that test in Royale didn't make sense > to me if the browser you are trying to run that code in is incompatible. My > idea was to use https://github.com/faisalman/ua-parser-js as a basis for > testing compatibility. > > Chris > -- > Chris Velevitch > m: 0415 469 095 > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
