You can have a bead at app level that will check runtime version and do something depending on result. That maybe is better to do this in html template as Chris. I'm not invested time, so can say much more on this. I'm pretty sure searching on internet will give better and tested results ready to be integrated.
El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 14:46, Piotr Zarzycki (< [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > Even if I find a > > way to integrate as a Royale code I'll do that too to get more control at > > level code, instead of having it just as template solution. > > > > > > I'm not entirely get that part, are you saying that you would prefer have > solution inside Royale which ? This is what you mean in above sentence ? > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 14:39 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > I think, I'll search for some JS library that could fit that and if not > go > > for some custom script like the one Chris is implementing. Even if I > find a > > way to integrate as a Royale code I'll do that too to get more control at > > level code, instead of having it just as template solution. > > > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 14:03, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > Assume that you have list of compatible web browsers and you need to > > > display for the user info that - hey your browser is incompatible. > > > > > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 14:02 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > Understand, but how would you do that if you will have to in your > app ? > > > > > > > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 13:49 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > >> Ok Piotr, > > > >> > > > >> now I understand. I'm not doing browser check in our app since our > > > client > > > >> knows the versions we support and the tablets their workforce use is > > > >> controlled. > > > >> We can do as well some checking logic to plug in royale, but my > email > > > was > > > >> more about giving flexibility to users that want to do that or > output > > > any > > > >> other js or html code they want. Browser checking is just one of > them. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:46, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > >> [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> > > > >> > Carlos, > > > >> > > > > >> > I don't refer to the compiler. As you can see in the code it is an > > > >> attempt > > > >> > of checking whether application is compatible with web browser. > [1] > > > Are > > > >> you > > > >> > doing that in your app ? > > > >> > > > > >> > If (browserversion < 44) > > > >> > { > > > >> > display something to the user > > > >> > } > > > >> > > > > >> > If not how would you do that ? > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets/jewel.html > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Piotr > > > >> > > > > >> > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 10:43 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > > >> > napisał(a): > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi Piotr, sorry but I don't catch what you're trying to say. > Sorry > > > :? > > > >> > > Anyway my proposal could not be the right one. Maybe others > could > > > >> bring > > > >> > > other one that works better. > > > >> > > The problem is that compiler output is currently very > restrictive, > > > and > > > >> > > doing some little changes there users > > > >> > > could extend their available options in custom html templates. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:37, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > >> > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Carlos, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Do you check in your application browser compatibility with > > Jewel > > > ? > > > >> How > > > >> > > > would you do this if you would like to display something if > > > browser > > > >> is > > > >> > > not > > > >> > > > compatible ? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > Piotr > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 10:34 Carlos Rovira < > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > > > napisał(a): > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Chris, > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Searching in royale-compiler, that line seems to be > generated > > in > > > >> > > > > MXMLRoyalePublisher.java > > > >> > > > > line 917 on getTemplateBody method > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > maybe the actual way compiler deal with this is a bit > > > restricted, > > > >> and > > > >> > > we > > > >> > > > > can update that part including the <script> tags in the html > > > >> template > > > >> > > and > > > >> > > > > making ${body} only outputs "new App.start();", so people > > could > > > >> > switch > > > >> > > to > > > >> > > > > its own "htmlTemplate" changing that to something like this: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > > >> > > > > royaleCompatibility = new RoyaleCompatibility(); > > > >> > > > > if (royaleCompatibility.isCompatible) { > > > >> > > > > ${body} > > > >> > > > > } else { > > > >> > > > > royaleCompatibility.displayIncompatibilityText(); > > > >> > > > > } > > > >> > > > > </script> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thoughts? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Carlos > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > El mar., 27 ago. 2019 a las 10:10, Chris Velevitch (< > > > >> > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Where is the value of "${body}" defined? When I build a > > > >> javascript > > > >> > > app, > > > >> > > > > the > > > >> > > > > > following code is inserted there:- > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > <script> > > > >> > > > > > new MyApp().start(); > > > >> > > > > > </script> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I want to be able to insert additional code there like:- > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > > >> > > > > > royaleCompatibility = new RoyaleCompatibility(); > > > >> > > > > > if (royaleCompatibility.isCompatible) { > > > >> > > > > > new MyApp().start(); > > > >> > > > > > } else { > > > >> > > > > > royaleCompatibility.displayIncompatibilityText(); > > > >> > > > > > } > > > >> > > > > > </script> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > How do I do that? > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > >> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > >> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > Carlos Rovira > > > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > > > >> > > > > >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Carlos Rovira > > > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
