On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 16:34, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote:
> maybe the actual way compiler deal with this is a bit restricted, and we
> can update that part including the <script> tags in the html template and
> making ${body} only outputs "new App.start();", so people could switch to
> its own "htmlTemplate"
Sounds like a good long term solution. Josh's suggestion also good as long
as you remember or know the main class name of the app in order to start it
in the customised HTML template.
As for compatibility testing, writing that test in Royale didn't make sense
to me if the browser you are trying to run that code in is incompatible. My
idea was to use https://github.com/faisalman/ua-parser-js as a basis for
testing compatibility.
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
m: 0415 469 095