Hi Noel, On Tuesday, 2007-06-26 13:33:33 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> ok, I also use > ScRange::ParseRows > ScRange::ParseColumns & Currently it doesn't matter because ScVbaRange::Columns() and ScVbaRange::Rows() don't test the return value anyway. ScRange::ParseRows() and ScRange::ParseCols() don't follow the other implementation semantics, that should be adapted. The SCA_VALID is never set, and they only set SCA_VALID_COL (even for ParseRows(), which seems to be a copy&paste error), but should set SCA_VALID_COL2 respectively SCA_VALIDD_ROW2 as well if a valid reference was recognized. > ScRange::Format That one sets the corresponding SCA_VALID_* bits internally if passed a SCA_VALID, so should be fine. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to this [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
