Hi Eike,
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 13:15 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > I think it should instead be > > if ((nRes & SCA_VALID ) && nTmp1 && !nTmp2) > nRes |= ((nRes & 0x070f) << 4); > > This because we only want to modify the result if ParseAny did not > return any SCA_VALID_...2 bit for the range end, right > and the result returned > may or may not include bits for absolute reference that have to be > included in the range end as well. The (nRes & 0x070f) effectively is hokay I understand, I will do it like that then, thanks alot!! Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
