On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:11:32 PM Gert Vanthienen wrote: > L.S., > > > Unless someone sees a real issue in the inconvenience of having the two CXF > features URLs in the assembly, I'm guessing we're going for Karaf 2.2.4/CXF > 2.4.4/Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE/... here for ServiceMix 4.4. I'll start updating > the POMs again to bump versions. > > BTW, I also understand the Camel community is planning to do a Camel 2.9.0 > release somewhere in the next few days -
It's only a 2.9.0-RC1, not a full 2.9.0 release. That's likely a couple weeks away. I'm actually hoping to get 2.9.0 on CXF 2.5.0 by then. Dan > would it be worth waiting for that > one too (and perhaps we can ask them to consider upgrading to CXF 2.4.4 as > well, that the entire universe is back in line)? > > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > ------------------------ > FuseSource > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > > L.S., > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out! It's good to know that the CXF community > > can facilitate those quick fix releases if necessary. By all means, if > > you or any of the other guys has some bandwidth to do the extra > > release, that would obviously be great. I guess the 'quick fix' that > > Freeman mentioned became the real solution then... > > > > I just gave things a quick try here and just upgrading to CXF > > 2.4.4-SNAPSHOT does seem to work out fine for the most part. There are > > some test failures in some of the itests, but those may well be > > something I missed in my attempt to quickly test this. Other than > > that, the resulting kit does seem to work fine - it does have multiple > > versions of the CXF features descriptor installed because the Camel > > descriptor still points at the old version (cfr. one of the issues that > > came up in the 'Features' thread earlier on). > > > > As far as I am concerned, this is just a minor inconvenience compared to > > the possible benefit of being able to upgrade to more recent fix > > versions of almost anything else, so if the offer to provide a CXF > > 2.4.4 fix release still stands, we'd highly appreciate that. > > > > (my apologies for the annoyance - it was in no way intentional, in > > ServiceMix-land we always have to wait for the entire universe to align > > to do a release - fancy a Belgian beer or some chocolates some day to > > make up for it ? ;)). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Gert Vanthienen > > ------------------------ > > FuseSource > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just want to point out that I find it slightly "annoying" that, > >> throughout > >> this discussion, not one person has even asked on the CXF lists what > >> it > >> would > >> take to get a 2.4.4 release out that fixes the issue. CXF is likely > >> the community that would be MOST willing to get releases out to fix > >> issues, it's > >> just a matter of asking. It's been done for Geronimo. It's been done > >> for JBoss. etc.... > >> > >> I'm planning on doing the CXF 2.5.0 builds later this week or early > >> next > >> week > >> (as discussed on dev@cxf earlier this month). Doing the 2.4.4 > >> release > >> at the > >> same time is not a big deal. We could have done one sooner if someone > >> would > >> have asked. For that matter, Freeman, Guillaume, Willem, etc.. > >> could > >> have > >> easily started a CXF release. Unlike smx releases, CXF releases are > >> fairly > >> quick and easy. Mostly painless. :-) And documented: > >> > >> http://cxf.apache.org/release-management.html > >> > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> On Monday, October 24, 2011 11:54:23 AM Gert Vanthienen wrote: > >> > Hey Freeman, > >> > > >> > > >> > I missed the remark that we're stuck on the backlevel versions - > >> > I'll > >> > >> make > >> > >> > the necessary corrections to get things on these versions again. > >> > > >> > FWIW, I do think we have to figure out a way to improve features > >> > >> descriptors > >> > >> > to avoid being stuck on entire set of backlevel artifacts just > >> > because > >> > >> of > >> > >> > one issue in one of the dependencies. There should be no > >> > technical > >> > >> reason > >> > >> > why we can't upgrade to Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE because of an issue > >> > in CXF 2.4.2 in my mind - shouldn't OSGi version ranges allow us > >> > to just do>> > >> these > >> > >> > little upgrades without breaking everything else? > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Gert Vanthienen > >> > ------------------------ > >> > FuseSource > >> > Web: http://fusesource.com > >> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > >> > > >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Freeman Fang > >> > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > > Hi JB, > >> > > > >> > > CXF 2.4.3 has a problem that the http-osgi transport can't > >> > > work with > >> > > felix, also the cxf 2.4.3 use spring 3.0.6 which can't work > >> > > with karaf 2.2.2, also camel 2.8.1 use cxf 2.4.2, for the > >> > > reason above all, we should use CXF 2.4.2/Camel 2.8.1/Karaf > >> > > 2.2.2 for SMX 4.4. > >> > > > >> > > Btw, I just revert for components trunk so that we still use > >> > > cxf > >> > >> 2.4.2. > >> > >> > > Regards > >> > > Freeman > >> > > > >> > > On 2011-10-17, at 下午5:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > >> All required dependencies are now available to ServiceMix > >> > >> 4.4: > >> > >> - CXF 2.4.3 has been released and available on Maven central > >> > >> repo > >> > >> - Camel 2.8.1 has been released and available on Maven > >> > >> central repo > >> > >> - ActiveMQ 5.5.0 is available > >> > >> - Karaf 2.2.2 is available > >> > >> > >> > >> I think that we are ready for the ServiceMix 4.4 release. > >> > >> > >> > >> As discussed before, the releases will be performed in a > >> > >> row, it > >> > >> means: > >> > >> - ServiceMix Utils 1.5.0 > >> > >> - ServiceMix Components 2011.02 > >> > >> - ServiceMix NMR 1.5.0 > >> > >> - ServiceMix (Features) 4.4.0 > >> > >> > >> > >> and in a second row: > >> > >> - ServiceMix 3.4 > >> > >> > >> > >> I guess that the following Jiras should be fixed before > >> > >> release: > >> > >> - SMX4-939 > >> > >> - SMX4-916 > >> > >> - SMX4-885 > >> > >> - SMX4-884 > >> > >> - SMX4NMR-269 > >> > >> > >> > >> I will pick up some. It could be great if we can cut off the > >> > >> releases at > >> > >> the end of this week. > >> > >> > >> > >> WDYT ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> JB > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> > >> [email protected] > >> > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > >> > > ------------------------------**--------------- > >> > > Freeman Fang > >> > > > >> > > FuseSource > >> > > Email:[email protected] > >> > > Web: fusesource.com > >> > > Twitter: freemanfang > >> > > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com > >> > > <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] > >> http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
