Karolis, The Camel 2.8.3 vote has been started today, so that will take a few more days (if it passes) before that will be available. We should be able to follow up with the ServiceMix release builds a few days after the Camel release is out in the wild, so I'd expect a release vote somewhere next week.
Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Karolis Petrauskas <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > > When do you expect to release ServiceMix 4.4? > > Thanks in advance, > Karolis > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Gert Vanthienen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > L.S., > > > > > > So it looks like both the CXF and Camel community can help us out with a > > quick fix release here, so let's make sure we're ready to follow up with > our > > ServiceMix 4.4.0 release batch as soon as those are done. We definitely > owe > > them an extra credit in the release announcement as well, imho ;) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Gert Vanthienen > > ------------------------ > > FuseSource > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Gert Vanthienen > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> L.S., > >> > >> > >> OK, so it looks like we have two options here: > >> #1. Karaf 2.2.2, CXF 2.4.2, Camel 2.8.1 and Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE, all of > >> which is available right now so we can start the release process any > day now > >> #2. Karaf 2.2.4, CXF 2.4.4 and/or CXF 2.5.0 and a matching Camel > release - > >> this would mean we're waiting for a few more weeks again until the CXF > and > >> Camel release are done > >> > >> Based on Dan's last mail, I'll ping the camel dev list to see if they > have > >> some bandwidth to do a quick Camel 2.8.3 release after the CXF 2.4.4 > release > >> is done - if there's a way to get things aligned in the next week or 2, > it's > >> probably well worth the wait. Otherwise, I'd suggest we go with #1 and > plan > >> for a follow-up release once Camel 2.9.0 is out. > >> > >> In the meanwhile, let's try to work with the Karaf team to figure out a > >> solution for some of these dependency alignment issues we're facing > (e.g. > >> with the references to other features.xml files) to ensure we don't > have to > >> do this exercise every time again. If we could get the features > >> cross-referencing issue resolved and make the features-maven-plugin a > bit > >> more version-aware, we should be able to get things out way quicker than > >> what we're doing now... FYI - the thread for that discussion is at > >> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Features-td3423534.html > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Gert Vanthienen > >> ------------------------ > >> FuseSource > >> Web: http://fusesource.com > >> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:11:32 PM Gert Vanthienen wrote: > >>> > L.S., > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Unless someone sees a real issue in the inconvenience of having the > two > >>> CXF > >>> > features URLs in the assembly, I'm guessing we're going for Karaf > >>> 2.2.4/CXF > >>> > 2.4.4/Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE/... here for ServiceMix 4.4. I'll start > >>> updating > >>> > the POMs again to bump versions. > >>> > > >>> > BTW, I also understand the Camel community is planning to do a Camel > >>> 2.9.0 > >>> > release somewhere in the next few days - > >>> > >>> It's only a 2.9.0-RC1, not a full 2.9.0 release. That's likely a > couple > >>> weeks away. I'm actually hoping to get 2.9.0 on CXF 2.5.0 by then. > >>> > >>> Dan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > would it be worth waiting for that > >>> > one too (and perhaps we can ask them to consider upgrading to CXF > 2.4.4 > >>> as > >>> > well, that the entire universe is back in line)? > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > > >>> > Gert Vanthienen > >>> > ------------------------ > >>> > FuseSource > >>> > Web: http://fusesource.com > >>> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen < > >>> [email protected] > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > L.S., > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks for pointing that out! It's good to know that the CXF > >>> community > >>> > > can facilitate those quick fix releases if necessary. By all > means, > >>> if > >>> > > you or any of the other guys has some bandwidth to do the extra > >>> > > release, that would obviously be great. I guess the 'quick fix' > that > >>> > > Freeman mentioned became the real solution then... > >>> > > > >>> > > I just gave things a quick try here and just upgrading to CXF > >>> > > 2.4.4-SNAPSHOT does seem to work out fine for the most part. There > >>> are > >>> > > some test failures in some of the itests, but those may well be > >>> > > something I missed in my attempt to quickly test this. Other than > >>> > > that, the resulting kit does seem to work fine - it does have > multiple > >>> > > versions of the CXF features descriptor installed because the Camel > >>> > > descriptor still points at the old version (cfr. one of the issues > >>> that > >>> > > came up in the 'Features' thread earlier on). > >>> > > > >>> > > As far as I am concerned, this is just a minor inconvenience > compared > >>> to > >>> > > the possible benefit of being able to upgrade to more recent fix > >>> > > versions of almost anything else, so if the offer to provide a CXF > >>> > > 2.4.4 fix release still stands, we'd highly appreciate that. > >>> > > > >>> > > (my apologies for the annoyance - it was in no way intentional, in > >>> > > ServiceMix-land we always have to wait for the entire universe to > >>> align > >>> > > to do a release - fancy a Belgian beer or some chocolates some day > to > >>> > > make up for it ? ;)). > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards, > >>> > > > >>> > > Gert Vanthienen > >>> > > ------------------------ > >>> > > FuseSource > >>> > > Web: http://fusesource.com > >>> > > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > >>> > > > >>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >> I just want to point out that I find it slightly "annoying" that, > >>> > >> throughout > >>> > >> this discussion, not one person has even asked on the CXF lists > what > >>> > >> it > >>> > >> would > >>> > >> take to get a 2.4.4 release out that fixes the issue. CXF is > likely > >>> > >> the community that would be MOST willing to get releases out to > fix > >>> > >> issues, it's > >>> > >> just a matter of asking. It's been done for Geronimo. It's been > >>> done > >>> > >> for JBoss. etc.... > >>> > >> > >>> > >> I'm planning on doing the CXF 2.5.0 builds later this week or > early > >>> > >> next > >>> > >> week > >>> > >> (as discussed on dev@cxf earlier this month). Doing the 2.4.4 > >>> > >> release > >>> > >> at the > >>> > >> same time is not a big deal. We could have done one sooner if > >>> someone > >>> > >> would > >>> > >> have asked. For that matter, Freeman, Guillaume, Willem, etc.. > >>> > >> could > >>> > >> have > >>> > >> easily started a CXF release. Unlike smx releases, CXF releases > are > >>> > >> fairly > >>> > >> quick and easy. Mostly painless. :-) And documented: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> http://cxf.apache.org/release-management.html > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Dan > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On Monday, October 24, 2011 11:54:23 AM Gert Vanthienen wrote: > >>> > >> > Hey Freeman, > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > I missed the remark that we're stuck on the backlevel versions - > >>> > >> > I'll > >>> > >> > >>> > >> make > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > the necessary corrections to get things on these versions again. > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > FWIW, I do think we have to figure out a way to improve features > >>> > >> > >>> > >> descriptors > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > to avoid being stuck on entire set of backlevel artifacts just > >>> > >> > because > >>> > >> > >>> > >> of > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > one issue in one of the dependencies. There should be no > >>> > >> > technical > >>> > >> > >>> > >> reason > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > why we can't upgrade to Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE because of an issue > >>> > >> > in CXF 2.4.2 in my mind - shouldn't OSGi version ranges allow us > >>> > >> > to just do>> > >>> > >> these > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > little upgrades without breaking everything else? > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Regards, > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Gert Vanthienen > >>> > >> > ------------------------ > >>> > >> > FuseSource > >>> > >> > Web: http://fusesource.com > >>> > >> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Freeman Fang > >>> > >> > >>> > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >> > > Hi JB, > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > CXF 2.4.3 has a problem that the http-osgi transport can't > >>> > >> > > work with > >>> > >> > > felix, also the cxf 2.4.3 use spring 3.0.6 which can't work > >>> > >> > > with karaf 2.2.2, also camel 2.8.1 use cxf 2.4.2, for the > >>> > >> > > reason above all, we should use CXF 2.4.2/Camel 2.8.1/Karaf > >>> > >> > > 2.2.2 for SMX 4.4. > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > Btw, I just revert for components trunk so that we still use > >>> > >> > > cxf > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 2.4.2. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > Regards > >>> > >> > > Freeman > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > On 2011-10-17, at 下午5:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>> > >> > > Hi all, > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> All required dependencies are now available to ServiceMix > >>> > >> > >> 4.4: > >>> > >> > >> - CXF 2.4.3 has been released and available on Maven central > >>> > >> > >> repo > >>> > >> > >> - Camel 2.8.1 has been released and available on Maven > >>> > >> > >> central repo > >>> > >> > >> - ActiveMQ 5.5.0 is available > >>> > >> > >> - Karaf 2.2.2 is available > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> I think that we are ready for the ServiceMix 4.4 release. > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> As discussed before, the releases will be performed in a > >>> > >> > >> row, it > >>> > >> > >> means: > >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix Utils 1.5.0 > >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix Components 2011.02 > >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix NMR 1.5.0 > >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix (Features) 4.4.0 > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> and in a second row: > >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix 3.4 > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> I guess that the following Jiras should be fixed before > >>> > >> > >> release: > >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-939 > >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-916 > >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-885 > >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-884 > >>> > >> > >> - SMX4NMR-269 > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> I will pick up some. It could be great if we can cut off the > >>> > >> > >> releases at > >>> > >> > >> the end of this week. > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> WDYT ? > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> Regards > >>> > >> > >> JB > >>> > >> > >> -- > >>> > >> > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> > >> > >> [email protected] > >>> > >> > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> > >> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > ------------------------------**--------------- > >>> > >> > > Freeman Fang > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > FuseSource > >>> > >> > > Email:[email protected] > >>> > >> > > Web: fusesource.com > >>> > >> > > Twitter: freemanfang > >>> > >> > > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com > >>> > >> > > <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> -- > >>> > >> Daniel Kulp > >>> > >> [email protected] > >>> > >> http://dankulp.com/blog > >>> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> -- > >>> Daniel Kulp > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://dankulp.com/blog > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >> > >> > > >
