Hello,
When do you expect to release ServiceMix 4.4?
Thanks in advance,
Karolis
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Gert Vanthienen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> So it looks like both the CXF and Camel community can help us out with a
> quick fix release here, so let's make sure we're ready to follow up with our
> ServiceMix 4.4.0 release batch as soon as those are done. We definitely owe
> them an extra credit in the release announcement as well, imho ;)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Gert Vanthienen
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> OK, so it looks like we have two options here:
>> #1. Karaf 2.2.2, CXF 2.4.2, Camel 2.8.1 and Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE, all of
>> which is available right now so we can start the release process any day now
>> #2. Karaf 2.2.4, CXF 2.4.4 and/or CXF 2.5.0 and a matching Camel release -
>> this would mean we're waiting for a few more weeks again until the CXF and
>> Camel release are done
>>
>> Based on Dan's last mail, I'll ping the camel dev list to see if they have
>> some bandwidth to do a quick Camel 2.8.3 release after the CXF 2.4.4 release
>> is done - if there's a way to get things aligned in the next week or 2, it's
>> probably well worth the wait. Otherwise, I'd suggest we go with #1 and plan
>> for a follow-up release once Camel 2.9.0 is out.
>>
>> In the meanwhile, let's try to work with the Karaf team to figure out a
>> solution for some of these dependency alignment issues we're facing (e.g.
>> with the references to other features.xml files) to ensure we don't have to
>> do this exercise every time again. If we could get the features
>> cross-referencing issue resolved and make the features-maven-plugin a bit
>> more version-aware, we should be able to get things out way quicker than
>> what we're doing now... FYI - the thread for that discussion is at
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Features-td3423534.html
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:11:32 PM Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>> > L.S.,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Unless someone sees a real issue in the inconvenience of having the two
>>> CXF
>>> > features URLs in the assembly, I'm guessing we're going for Karaf
>>> 2.2.4/CXF
>>> > 2.4.4/Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE/... here for ServiceMix 4.4. I'll start
>>> updating
>>> > the POMs again to bump versions.
>>> >
>>> > BTW, I also understand the Camel community is planning to do a Camel
>>> 2.9.0
>>> > release somewhere in the next few days -
>>>
>>> It's only a 2.9.0-RC1, not a full 2.9.0 release. That's likely a couple
>>> weeks away. I'm actually hoping to get 2.9.0 on CXF 2.5.0 by then.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > would it be worth waiting for that
>>> > one too (and perhaps we can ask them to consider upgrading to CXF 2.4.4
>>> as
>>> > well, that the entire universe is back in line)?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Gert Vanthienen
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > FuseSource
>>> > Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen <
>>> [email protected]
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > L.S.,
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks for pointing that out! It's good to know that the CXF
>>> community
>>> > > can facilitate those quick fix releases if necessary. By all means,
>>> if
>>> > > you or any of the other guys has some bandwidth to do the extra
>>> > > release, that would obviously be great. I guess the 'quick fix' that
>>> > > Freeman mentioned became the real solution then...
>>> > >
>>> > > I just gave things a quick try here and just upgrading to CXF
>>> > > 2.4.4-SNAPSHOT does seem to work out fine for the most part. There
>>> are
>>> > > some test failures in some of the itests, but those may well be
>>> > > something I missed in my attempt to quickly test this. Other than
>>> > > that, the resulting kit does seem to work fine - it does have multiple
>>> > > versions of the CXF features descriptor installed because the Camel
>>> > > descriptor still points at the old version (cfr. one of the issues
>>> that
>>> > > came up in the 'Features' thread earlier on).
>>> > >
>>> > > As far as I am concerned, this is just a minor inconvenience compared
>>> to
>>> > > the possible benefit of being able to upgrade to more recent fix
>>> > > versions of almost anything else, so if the offer to provide a CXF
>>> > > 2.4.4 fix release still stands, we'd highly appreciate that.
>>> > >
>>> > > (my apologies for the annoyance - it was in no way intentional, in
>>> > > ServiceMix-land we always have to wait for the entire universe to
>>> align
>>> > > to do a release - fancy a Belgian beer or some chocolates some day to
>>> > > make up for it ? ;)).
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Gert Vanthienen
>>> > > ------------------------
>>> > > FuseSource
>>> > > Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> > > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> I just want to point out that I find it slightly "annoying" that,
>>> > >> throughout
>>> > >> this discussion, not one person has even asked on the CXF lists what
>>> > >> it
>>> > >> would
>>> > >> take to get a 2.4.4 release out that fixes the issue. CXF is likely
>>> > >> the community that would be MOST willing to get releases out to fix
>>> > >> issues, it's
>>> > >> just a matter of asking. It's been done for Geronimo. It's been
>>> done
>>> > >> for JBoss. etc....
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I'm planning on doing the CXF 2.5.0 builds later this week or early
>>> > >> next
>>> > >> week
>>> > >> (as discussed on dev@cxf earlier this month). Doing the 2.4.4
>>> > >> release
>>> > >> at the
>>> > >> same time is not a big deal. We could have done one sooner if
>>> someone
>>> > >> would
>>> > >> have asked. For that matter, Freeman, Guillaume, Willem, etc..
>>> > >> could
>>> > >> have
>>> > >> easily started a CXF release. Unlike smx releases, CXF releases are
>>> > >> fairly
>>> > >> quick and easy. Mostly painless. :-) And documented:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> http://cxf.apache.org/release-management.html
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Dan
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Monday, October 24, 2011 11:54:23 AM Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>> > >> > Hey Freeman,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I missed the remark that we're stuck on the backlevel versions -
>>> > >> > I'll
>>> > >>
>>> > >> make
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > the necessary corrections to get things on these versions again.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > FWIW, I do think we have to figure out a way to improve features
>>> > >>
>>> > >> descriptors
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > to avoid being stuck on entire set of backlevel artifacts just
>>> > >> > because
>>> > >>
>>> > >> of
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > one issue in one of the dependencies. There should be no
>>> > >> > technical
>>> > >>
>>> > >> reason
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > why we can't upgrade to Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE because of an issue
>>> > >> > in CXF 2.4.2 in my mind - shouldn't OSGi version ranges allow us
>>> > >> > to just do>>
>>> > >> these
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > little upgrades without breaking everything else?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Regards,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Gert Vanthienen
>>> > >> > ------------------------
>>> > >> > FuseSource
>>> > >> > Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> > >> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Freeman Fang
>>> > >>
>>> > >> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>> > >> > > Hi JB,
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > CXF 2.4.3 has a problem that the http-osgi transport can't
>>> > >> > > work with
>>> > >> > > felix, also the cxf 2.4.3 use spring 3.0.6 which can't work
>>> > >> > > with karaf 2.2.2, also camel 2.8.1 use cxf 2.4.2, for the
>>> > >> > > reason above all, we should use CXF 2.4.2/Camel 2.8.1/Karaf
>>> > >> > > 2.2.2 for SMX 4.4.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Btw, I just revert for components trunk so that we still use
>>> > >> > > cxf
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 2.4.2.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > > Regards
>>> > >> > > Freeman
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On 2011-10-17, at 下午5:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> > >> > > Hi all,
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> All required dependencies are now available to ServiceMix
>>> > >> > >> 4.4:
>>> > >> > >> - CXF 2.4.3 has been released and available on Maven central
>>> > >> > >> repo
>>> > >> > >> - Camel 2.8.1 has been released and available on Maven
>>> > >> > >> central repo
>>> > >> > >> - ActiveMQ 5.5.0 is available
>>> > >> > >> - Karaf 2.2.2 is available
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> I think that we are ready for the ServiceMix 4.4 release.
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> As discussed before, the releases will be performed in a
>>> > >> > >> row, it
>>> > >> > >> means:
>>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix Utils 1.5.0
>>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix Components 2011.02
>>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix NMR 1.5.0
>>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix (Features) 4.4.0
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> and in a second row:
>>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix 3.4
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> I guess that the following Jiras should be fixed before
>>> > >> > >> release:
>>> > >> > >> - SMX4-939
>>> > >> > >> - SMX4-916
>>> > >> > >> - SMX4-885
>>> > >> > >> - SMX4-884
>>> > >> > >> - SMX4NMR-269
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> I will pick up some. It could be great if we can cut off the
>>> > >> > >> releases at
>>> > >> > >> the end of this week.
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> WDYT ?
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> Regards
>>> > >> > >> JB
>>> > >> > >> --
>>> > >> > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > >> > >> [email protected]
>>> > >> > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> > >> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > ------------------------------**---------------
>>> > >> > > Freeman Fang
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > FuseSource
>>> > >> > > Email:[email protected]
>>> > >> > > Web: fusesource.com
>>> > >> > > Twitter: freemanfang
>>> > >> > > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com
>>> > >> > > <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Daniel Kulp
>>> > >> [email protected]
>>> > >> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
