Thanks!
Karolis On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> wrote: > Karolis, > > The Camel 2.8.3 vote has been started today, so that will take a few more > days (if it passes) before that will be available. We should be able to > follow up with the ServiceMix release builds a few days after the Camel > release is out in the wild, so I'd expect a release vote somewhere next > week. > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > ------------------------ > FuseSource > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Karolis Petrauskas > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> When do you expect to release ServiceMix 4.4? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Karolis >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Gert Vanthienen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > L.S., >> > >> > >> > So it looks like both the CXF and Camel community can help us out with a >> > quick fix release here, so let's make sure we're ready to follow up with >> our >> > ServiceMix 4.4.0 release batch as soon as those are done. We definitely >> owe >> > them an extra credit in the release announcement as well, imho ;) >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Gert Vanthienen >> > ------------------------ >> > FuseSource >> > Web: http://fusesource.com >> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Gert Vanthienen >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> L.S., >> >> >> >> >> >> OK, so it looks like we have two options here: >> >> #1. Karaf 2.2.2, CXF 2.4.2, Camel 2.8.1 and Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE, all of >> >> which is available right now so we can start the release process any >> day now >> >> #2. Karaf 2.2.4, CXF 2.4.4 and/or CXF 2.5.0 and a matching Camel >> release - >> >> this would mean we're waiting for a few more weeks again until the CXF >> and >> >> Camel release are done >> >> >> >> Based on Dan's last mail, I'll ping the camel dev list to see if they >> have >> >> some bandwidth to do a quick Camel 2.8.3 release after the CXF 2.4.4 >> release >> >> is done - if there's a way to get things aligned in the next week or 2, >> it's >> >> probably well worth the wait. Otherwise, I'd suggest we go with #1 and >> plan >> >> for a follow-up release once Camel 2.9.0 is out. >> >> >> >> In the meanwhile, let's try to work with the Karaf team to figure out a >> >> solution for some of these dependency alignment issues we're facing >> (e.g. >> >> with the references to other features.xml files) to ensure we don't >> have to >> >> do this exercise every time again. If we could get the features >> >> cross-referencing issue resolved and make the features-maven-plugin a >> bit >> >> more version-aware, we should be able to get things out way quicker than >> >> what we're doing now... FYI - the thread for that discussion is at >> >> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Features-td3423534.html >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> >> ------------------------ >> >> FuseSource >> >> Web: http://fusesource.com >> >> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:11:32 PM Gert Vanthienen wrote: >> >>> > L.S., >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Unless someone sees a real issue in the inconvenience of having the >> two >> >>> CXF >> >>> > features URLs in the assembly, I'm guessing we're going for Karaf >> >>> 2.2.4/CXF >> >>> > 2.4.4/Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE/... here for ServiceMix 4.4. I'll start >> >>> updating >> >>> > the POMs again to bump versions. >> >>> > >> >>> > BTW, I also understand the Camel community is planning to do a Camel >> >>> 2.9.0 >> >>> > release somewhere in the next few days - >> >>> >> >>> It's only a 2.9.0-RC1, not a full 2.9.0 release. That's likely a >> couple >> >>> weeks away. I'm actually hoping to get 2.9.0 on CXF 2.5.0 by then. >> >>> >> >>> Dan >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > would it be worth waiting for that >> >>> > one too (and perhaps we can ask them to consider upgrading to CXF >> 2.4.4 >> >>> as >> >>> > well, that the entire universe is back in line)? >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Regards, >> >>> > >> >>> > Gert Vanthienen >> >>> > ------------------------ >> >>> > FuseSource >> >>> > Web: http://fusesource.com >> >>> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen < >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> > > wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > L.S., >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Thanks for pointing that out! It's good to know that the CXF >> >>> community >> >>> > > can facilitate those quick fix releases if necessary. By all >> means, >> >>> if >> >>> > > you or any of the other guys has some bandwidth to do the extra >> >>> > > release, that would obviously be great. I guess the 'quick fix' >> that >> >>> > > Freeman mentioned became the real solution then... >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I just gave things a quick try here and just upgrading to CXF >> >>> > > 2.4.4-SNAPSHOT does seem to work out fine for the most part. There >> >>> are >> >>> > > some test failures in some of the itests, but those may well be >> >>> > > something I missed in my attempt to quickly test this. Other than >> >>> > > that, the resulting kit does seem to work fine - it does have >> multiple >> >>> > > versions of the CXF features descriptor installed because the Camel >> >>> > > descriptor still points at the old version (cfr. one of the issues >> >>> that >> >>> > > came up in the 'Features' thread earlier on). >> >>> > > >> >>> > > As far as I am concerned, this is just a minor inconvenience >> compared >> >>> to >> >>> > > the possible benefit of being able to upgrade to more recent fix >> >>> > > versions of almost anything else, so if the offer to provide a CXF >> >>> > > 2.4.4 fix release still stands, we'd highly appreciate that. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > (my apologies for the annoyance - it was in no way intentional, in >> >>> > > ServiceMix-land we always have to wait for the entire universe to >> >>> align >> >>> > > to do a release - fancy a Belgian beer or some chocolates some day >> to >> >>> > > make up for it ? ;)). >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Regards, >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Gert Vanthienen >> >>> > > ------------------------ >> >>> > > FuseSource >> >>> > > Web: http://fusesource.com >> >>> > > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> I just want to point out that I find it slightly "annoying" that, >> >>> > >> throughout >> >>> > >> this discussion, not one person has even asked on the CXF lists >> what >> >>> > >> it >> >>> > >> would >> >>> > >> take to get a 2.4.4 release out that fixes the issue. CXF is >> likely >> >>> > >> the community that would be MOST willing to get releases out to >> fix >> >>> > >> issues, it's >> >>> > >> just a matter of asking. It's been done for Geronimo. It's been >> >>> done >> >>> > >> for JBoss. etc.... >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> I'm planning on doing the CXF 2.5.0 builds later this week or >> early >> >>> > >> next >> >>> > >> week >> >>> > >> (as discussed on dev@cxf earlier this month). Doing the 2.4.4 >> >>> > >> release >> >>> > >> at the >> >>> > >> same time is not a big deal. We could have done one sooner if >> >>> someone >> >>> > >> would >> >>> > >> have asked. For that matter, Freeman, Guillaume, Willem, etc.. >> >>> > >> could >> >>> > >> have >> >>> > >> easily started a CXF release. Unlike smx releases, CXF releases >> are >> >>> > >> fairly >> >>> > >> quick and easy. Mostly painless. :-) And documented: >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> http://cxf.apache.org/release-management.html >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> Dan >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> On Monday, October 24, 2011 11:54:23 AM Gert Vanthienen wrote: >> >>> > >> > Hey Freeman, >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > I missed the remark that we're stuck on the backlevel versions - >> >>> > >> > I'll >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> make >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > the necessary corrections to get things on these versions again. >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > FWIW, I do think we have to figure out a way to improve features >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> descriptors >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > to avoid being stuck on entire set of backlevel artifacts just >> >>> > >> > because >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> of >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > one issue in one of the dependencies. There should be no >> >>> > >> > technical >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> reason >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > why we can't upgrade to Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE because of an issue >> >>> > >> > in CXF 2.4.2 in my mind - shouldn't OSGi version ranges allow us >> >>> > >> > to just do>> >> >>> > >> these >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > little upgrades without breaking everything else? >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > Regards, >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > Gert Vanthienen >> >>> > >> > ------------------------ >> >>> > >> > FuseSource >> >>> > >> > Web: http://fusesource.com >> >>> > >> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Freeman Fang >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> > >> > > Hi JB, >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > CXF 2.4.3 has a problem that the http-osgi transport can't >> >>> > >> > > work with >> >>> > >> > > felix, also the cxf 2.4.3 use spring 3.0.6 which can't work >> >>> > >> > > with karaf 2.2.2, also camel 2.8.1 use cxf 2.4.2, for the >> >>> > >> > > reason above all, we should use CXF 2.4.2/Camel 2.8.1/Karaf >> >>> > >> > > 2.2.2 for SMX 4.4. >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > Btw, I just revert for components trunk so that we still use >> >>> > >> > > cxf >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> 2.4.2. >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > > Regards >> >>> > >> > > Freeman >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > On 2011-10-17, at 下午5:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >>> > >> > > Hi all, >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > >> All required dependencies are now available to ServiceMix >> >>> > >> > >> 4.4: >> >>> > >> > >> - CXF 2.4.3 has been released and available on Maven central >> >>> > >> > >> repo >> >>> > >> > >> - Camel 2.8.1 has been released and available on Maven >> >>> > >> > >> central repo >> >>> > >> > >> - ActiveMQ 5.5.0 is available >> >>> > >> > >> - Karaf 2.2.2 is available >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> I think that we are ready for the ServiceMix 4.4 release. >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> As discussed before, the releases will be performed in a >> >>> > >> > >> row, it >> >>> > >> > >> means: >> >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix Utils 1.5.0 >> >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix Components 2011.02 >> >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix NMR 1.5.0 >> >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix (Features) 4.4.0 >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> and in a second row: >> >>> > >> > >> - ServiceMix 3.4 >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> I guess that the following Jiras should be fixed before >> >>> > >> > >> release: >> >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-939 >> >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-916 >> >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-885 >> >>> > >> > >> - SMX4-884 >> >>> > >> > >> - SMX4NMR-269 >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> I will pick up some. It could be great if we can cut off the >> >>> > >> > >> releases at >> >>> > >> > >> the end of this week. >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> WDYT ? >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> Regards >> >>> > >> > >> JB >> >>> > >> > >> -- >> >>> > >> > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected] >> >>> > >> > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> >>> > >> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > ------------------------------**--------------- >> >>> > >> > > Freeman Fang >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > FuseSource >> >>> > >> > > Email:[email protected] >> >>> > >> > > Web: fusesource.com >> >>> > >> > > Twitter: freemanfang >> >>> > >> > > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com >> >>> > >> > > <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> -- >> >>> > >> Daniel Kulp >> >>> > >> [email protected] >> >>> > >> http://dankulp.com/blog >> >>> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >>> -- >> >>> Daniel Kulp >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> http://dankulp.com/blog >> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >
