Hi,

Raul had one more suggestion to add to that list: doing a 4.6.0 with
Karaf 2.3.x and using Karaf 3.x for ServiceMix 5.  Instead of
resorting to a vote for something like this, I think it would be
better to try and build a consensus first.

I think we should go for "SMX 5 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 6 with Karaf
3.x", for two reasons:
- From a "marketing" perspective, using Karaf 2.x for ServiceMix 5 and
Karaf 3.x for ServiceMix 6 would give us the opportunity to signal two
important changes to the community: officially dropping JBI/NMR
support would be the highlight of ServiceMix and Karaf 3 would be the
highlight for ServiceMix 6.  We can probably even get the first
ServiceMix 5 release out next week or so, if we focus on the task at
hand and if all goes well.
- From a technical perspective, this does give us quite a bit of
flexibility to cater to the needs of the community by allowing us to
nicely do Karaf 2.3.x/2.4.x and 3.x based releases side-by-side for a
while, until we managed to convince everyone to switch to Karaf 3 ;).


Regards,

Gert


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think  somebody should start the vote. We have 2 options:
>
>  * SMX 5 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 6 with Karaf 3.x
>  * SMX 4.9 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 5 with Karaf 3.x
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> On 17.02.2014 16:59, Cristiano Costantini wrote:
>>
>> I've already repeated my position up to be annoying :-) but I repeat that
>> for me either solutions are ok
>> Maybe a quick vote could be the fastest and more democratic way to take a
>> decision ?s
>>
>> Could someone please summarize the available options?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cristiano
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-17 16:53 GMT+01:00 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi Raul,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think 4.9.0 is a bit of a strange version number as well.  But
>>> you're also right that some users will take a bit longer to move over
>>> to Karaf 3.   What's more: the version may not even be as temporary
>>> for us as we would hope, perhaps we end up doing another release in
>>> that series if people in the community are asking about another Karaf
>>> 2.x based release after this one.
>>>
>>> We do want that to be based on the current ServiceMix 5 codebase
>>> (without JBI/NMR) and not on the current ServiceMix 4.x codebase?
>>> Because the latter was the original plan and we failed to get any
>>> contributors to help out with that effort.
>>>
>>> I do wonder if we won't end up confusing people as well, when
>>> ServiceMix 4.6.0 suddenly no longer has any JBI/NMR support in there.
>>> We can probably communicate that though, so it might not be that big a
>>> problem, but we might also want to reconsider Krzysztof's proposal to
>>> go with 5.x for the Karaf 2.x-based assemblies without JBI/NMR (and we
>>> can have a few of those, using Karaf 2.3.x and 2.4.x) and use 6.x for
>>> the Karaf 3-based assemblies.
>>>
>

Reply via email to