+1 for SMX 5 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 6 with Karaf 3.x We better give more time for community to adopt Karaf 3.x, collect more feedback of Karaf 3.x in Karaf community, etc. And then SMX move to Karaf 3.x －－－－－－－－－－－－－ Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-2-18, at 上午9:49, Gert Vanthienen wrote: > Hi, > > > Raul had one more suggestion to add to that list: doing a 4.6.0 with > Karaf 2.3.x and using Karaf 3.x for ServiceMix 5. Instead of > resorting to a vote for something like this, I think it would be > better to try and build a consensus first. > > I think we should go for "SMX 5 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 6 with Karaf > 3.x", for two reasons: > - From a "marketing" perspective, using Karaf 2.x for ServiceMix 5 and > Karaf 3.x for ServiceMix 6 would give us the opportunity to signal two > important changes to the community: officially dropping JBI/NMR > support would be the highlight of ServiceMix and Karaf 3 would be the > highlight for ServiceMix 6. We can probably even get the first > ServiceMix 5 release out next week or so, if we focus on the task at > hand and if all goes well. > - From a technical perspective, this does give us quite a bit of > flexibility to cater to the needs of the community by allowing us to > nicely do Karaf 2.3.x/2.4.x and 3.x based releases side-by-side for a > while, until we managed to convince everyone to switch to Karaf 3 ;). > > > Regards, > > Gert > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I think somebody should start the vote. We have 2 options: >> >> * SMX 5 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 6 with Karaf 3.x >> * SMX 4.9 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 5 with Karaf 3.x >> >> Regards >> Krzysztof >> >> >> >> On 17.02.2014 16:59, Cristiano Costantini wrote: >>> >>> I've already repeated my position up to be annoying :-) but I repeat that >>> for me either solutions are ok >>> Maybe a quick vote could be the fastest and more democratic way to take a >>> decision ?s >>> >>> Could someone please summarize the available options? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Cristiano >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-02-17 16:53 GMT+01:00 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi Raul, >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I think 4.9.0 is a bit of a strange version number as well. But >>>> you're also right that some users will take a bit longer to move over >>>> to Karaf 3. What's more: the version may not even be as temporary >>>> for us as we would hope, perhaps we end up doing another release in >>>> that series if people in the community are asking about another Karaf >>>> 2.x based release after this one. >>>> >>>> We do want that to be based on the current ServiceMix 5 codebase >>>> (without JBI/NMR) and not on the current ServiceMix 4.x codebase? >>>> Because the latter was the original plan and we failed to get any >>>> contributors to help out with that effort. >>>> >>>> I do wonder if we won't end up confusing people as well, when >>>> ServiceMix 4.6.0 suddenly no longer has any JBI/NMR support in there. >>>> We can probably communicate that though, so it might not be that big a >>>> problem, but we might also want to reconsider Krzysztof's proposal to >>>> go with 5.x for the Karaf 2.x-based assemblies without JBI/NMR (and we >>>> can have a few of those, using Karaf 2.3.x and 2.4.x) and use 6.x for >>>> the Karaf 3-based assemblies. >>>> >>
