Hi Chris, i am ready. Last year i was thinking to write documentation with examples but couldn't do that. i hate apache way of trunk and website.
This time i can help creating few html pages. Regards, Raj On Sunday 8 November 2015, Chris Spiliotopoulos < chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > having listened carefully to all the voices from the community so far, I > have come down to the following conclusion. > > There are many professionals among us that have been working in the shadows > supporting this project in diverse ways - evangelizing, advocating, > integrating, etc. without the 'shoulders' of a bold-named company like > Google or IBM (who has been the active maintainer of this project for a > number of years now). > > My gut feeling so far has told me that - as has already happened with many > other technologies - these companies usually invest an amount of time and > money for experimenting with different types of technologies and if things > don't go as planned in the long run, what seems to be happening is that > some other company takes over on the experiment and so on, until no big > name is really interested any more. > > During this lifecycle, many other companies are starting to adopt the > technologies and they are indeed putting them into good use to serve their > purposes. And this is exactly where we stand at the moment. I can totally > understand the feelings coming from Ichiro and Darren and at the same time > I get Ryan's point of view. So how do we handle this situation? Speaking > for myself, as I come from Greece and I have to live and work in a country > that is in crisis mode for quite a few years now, all I can say is that a > crisis can be the mother of invention and change for a better tomorrow. > And this is exactly how I see this situation - in a metaphorical way of > course :) > > I think that now is the right time to make a change. Things have changed > in our industry during the last 10 years and so have trends and > communities. Maybe 10 years ago, the Apache Foundation was the place to be > but now this is definitely not the case - of course this doesn't mean that > the foundation is not the birthplace of great technologies. But all the > action now is over at GitHub. > > So, since Ryan gave us the green light (from the foundation's perspective) > that the project can be migrated, I'm outlining my proposals: > > - We break down the Shindig project into a number of distinct parts - > personally I've never used the OpenSocial features and have no interest > in > them since I'm heavily focused on the gadget containment and rendering > facilities. But there are people like Rene who have invested a lot of > time > and work on extending the OpenSocial features. > - We give it a brand new name - never liked the name Shindig in the > first place (speaking for myself once more). I think that this is very > important since we want to make a bold statement to communities that > this > technology is active, we're using it and others should try it out > because > it may solve them a number of problems. > - Create a modern web site on GitHub where we can all share our > experiences through show cases, usage examples and tutorials > - We start thinking around the concept of a gadget-centered marketplace > - in the context of show casing stuff. If I remember correctly Darren's > team has already launched a project which is very similar to the iGoogle > web site so he could certainly provide some ideas. > - Issues and feature requests can be handled directly though GitHub in a > more agile and community oriented approach without any of the > bureaucratic > processes imposed by the Apache Foundation. Once the 'monolith' is > broken > down into different projects then it would be more manageable and people > having certain skills could join forces > - By utilizing technologies like Docker there is no need for hosting > resources and sample material - we can bundle our examples, show cases, > etc > in self-sufficient Docker images and host them over @ DockerHub. The > integration with GitHub is seamless so this is a no brainer > - Reach out to Atlassian, Jive and the rest of the companies who we know > for sure that they have invested a lot in this technology (and actively > use > it) to help with this effort - e.g. Atlassian has extended Shindig > container & engine to meet their requirements and they definitely have > devs > who know the bits and pieces > > So the question now for me is really simple. How many of us want to move > over to the next phase without getting into any sort of credibility issues > regarding our choices? +1 from me. > > Kind regards, > Chris > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > I completely understand. I can't speak to the continued support of > vendors > > who have adopted Shindig, but I would imagine that they can't just stop > > supporting the products consuming Shindig. I am sorry that this puts you > > in a tough position but this is a natural cycle of open source software. > > With no community willing to support and enhance the project there is not > > much we can do. If someone takes the code and the project regains life > > somewhere else, that is great. > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM Ichiro Furusato < > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Ryan, > > > > > > While the code is stable and available I can't go to our CIO and > > architects > > > and > > > advocate use of a project as the basis for our online delivery if the > > > project has > > > folded. We were planning to replace literally five separate legacy > > portals > > > (that > > > have been accumulating like mold rather than serve as replacements) > using > > > Liferay, with our online widgets being replaced by Open Social Gadgets. > > > With > > > the demise of Shindig I assume Liferay's support of embedded Shindig > will > > > likely disappear, and therefore my ability to advocate for its use. > > > > > > It's not the availability of the code, it's the living status of the > > > project. If the > > > project is dead I can't very well suggest we base millions of dollars > of > > > online > > > delivery over the next 5-10 years on it. As I am responsible for that > > > decision > > > I could hardly be said to be responsible in advocating for its use at > > this > > > stage. > > > > > > Sadly. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Ichiro > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Ichiro, while the project will move to the attic, it doesn't mean you > > > can't > > > > continue to use it. If it is stable enough as it is right now for > you > > > than > > > > you should be able to continue to use it as is. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:59 AM Ichiro Furusato < > > > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > To add just one more voice to the chorus, I'm likewise very sad to > > hear > > > > of > > > > > the demise of what > > > > > seemed (until this notice) to be a functional and mature project. > For > > > the > > > > > past nine months I have > > > > > advocated replacing the four (!) existing (legacy) aviation and > > > industry > > > > > delivery platforms of the > > > > > Meteorological Service of New Zealand (MetService) with a > > > Liferay/Shindig > > > > > based site. Over the > > > > > past year we prototyped a replacement service and are currently > > > awaiting > > > > > the next project > > > > > funding cycle. Having to go back to our executive management team > and > > > > tell > > > > > them that the > > > > > basic architecture of our proposed service is somewhat > embarrassing, > > > and > > > > we > > > > > will likewise now > > > > > need to reevaluate and design a new solution. As the lead designer > I > > > have > > > > > been quite happy > > > > > with the Shindig/Open Social Gadget technology, and we had looked > > > forward > > > > > to a robust > > > > > implementation cycle, replacing fifteen years of crufty service > with > > a > > > > > shiny new Gadget-based > > > > > solution. > > > > > > > > > > Sincere thanks to the development team for an excellent job, very > > sorry > > > > to > > > > > hear about it being > > > > > put into the Attic. There may have been inactivity in the dev side > at > > > > > Apache but we were actively > > > > > using, and planning to use it for a substantial part of our online > > > > weather > > > > > delivery solution. > > > > > > > > > > Ichiro > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi fellow Shindig Devs, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to let you all know that the Shindig PMC has voted > to > > > > > > terminate the Shindig project and move it to the attic. I have > > > already > > > > > > informed the Apache board about the termination in this months > > board > > > > > report > > > > > > (below). > > > > > > > > > > > > As most of you have probably noticed we have seen a decline in > > > > > > participation in all aspects of the project over the past months > > and > > > > the > > > > > > downward trend has been happening for over a year now. This can > > > > > certainly > > > > > > be seen in our reports to the board [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > If anyone has any questions please let me know, and I will be > sure > > to > > > > > keep > > > > > > everyone up to date as we transition the project to the attic. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/Board+Reports > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > > > From: Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > Date: Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:29 PM > > > > > > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project > > > > > > To: bo...@apache.org <javascript:;> <bo...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > Cc: priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;> < > priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the Apache > > DirectMemory > > > > > > project has chosen by vote to recommend moving the project to the > > > > > > Attic; and > > > > > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer in the best > > > > > > interest of the Foundation to continue the Apache Shindig project > > > > > > due to inactivity; > > > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig > > > > > > project is hereby terminated; and be it further > > > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is tasked with > > > > > > oversight over the software developed by the Apache Shindig > > > > > > Project; and be it further > > > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Shindig" is > > > > > > hereby terminated; and be it further > > > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig PMC is hereby terminated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Chris Spiliotopoulos > > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect> >
