Hi Raj,

well I guess this makes 2 of us!  Let's wait for what others have to say
just to get a clear view of all the perspectives.

Cheers



On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Chris,
> i am ready.
> Last year i was thinking to write documentation with examples but couldn't
> do that. i hate apache way of trunk and website.
>
> This time i can help creating few html pages.
>
> Regards,
> Raj
>
> On Sunday 8 November 2015, Chris Spiliotopoulos <
> chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > having listened carefully to all the voices from the community so far, I
> > have come down to the following conclusion.
> >
> > There are many professionals among us that have been working in the
> shadows
> > supporting this project in diverse ways - evangelizing, advocating,
> > integrating, etc. without the 'shoulders' of a bold-named company like
> > Google or IBM (who has been the active maintainer of this project for a
> > number of years now).
> >
> > My gut feeling so far has told me that - as has already happened with
> many
> > other technologies - these companies usually invest an amount of time and
> > money for experimenting with different types of technologies and if
> things
> > don't go as planned in the long run, what seems to be happening is that
> > some other company takes over on the experiment and so on, until no big
> > name is really interested any more.
> >
> > During this lifecycle, many other companies are starting to adopt the
> > technologies and they are indeed putting them into good use to serve
> their
> > purposes.  And this is exactly where we stand at the moment.  I can
> totally
> > understand the feelings coming from Ichiro and Darren and at the same
> time
> > I get Ryan's point of view.  So how do we handle this situation?
> Speaking
> > for myself, as I come from Greece and I have to live and work in a
> country
> > that is in crisis mode for quite a few years now, all I can say is that a
> > crisis can be the mother of invention and change for a better tomorrow.
> > And this is exactly how I see this situation - in a metaphorical way of
> > course :)
> >
> > I think that now is the right time to make a change.  Things have changed
> > in our industry during the last 10 years and so have trends and
> > communities.  Maybe 10 years ago, the Apache Foundation was the place to
> be
> > but now this is definitely not the case - of course this doesn't mean
> that
> > the foundation is not the birthplace of great technologies.  But all the
> > action now is over at GitHub.
> >
> > So, since Ryan gave us the green light (from the foundation's
> perspective)
> > that the project can be migrated, I'm outlining my proposals:
> >
> >    - We break down the Shindig project into a number of distinct parts -
> >    personally I've never used the OpenSocial features and have no
> interest
> > in
> >    them since I'm heavily focused on the gadget containment and rendering
> >    facilities.  But there are people like Rene who have invested a lot of
> > time
> >    and work on extending the OpenSocial features.
> >    - We give it a brand new name - never liked the name Shindig in the
> >    first place (speaking for myself once more).  I think that this is
> very
> >    important since we want to make a bold statement to communities that
> > this
> >    technology is active, we're using it and others should try it out
> > because
> >    it may solve them a number of problems.
> >    - Create a modern web site on GitHub where we can all share our
> >    experiences through show cases, usage examples and tutorials
> >    - We start thinking around the concept of a gadget-centered
> marketplace
> >    - in the context of show casing stuff.  If I remember correctly
> Darren's
> >    team has already launched a project which is very similar to the
> iGoogle
> >    web site so he could certainly provide some ideas.
> >    - Issues and feature requests can be handled directly though GitHub
> in a
> >    more agile and community oriented approach without any of the
> > bureaucratic
> >    processes imposed by the Apache Foundation.  Once the 'monolith' is
> > broken
> >    down into different projects then it would be more manageable and
> people
> >    having certain skills could join forces
> >    - By utilizing technologies like Docker there is no need for hosting
> >    resources and sample material - we can bundle our examples, show
> cases,
> > etc
> >    in self-sufficient Docker images and host them over @ DockerHub.  The
> >    integration with GitHub is seamless so this is a no brainer
> >    - Reach out to Atlassian, Jive and the rest of the companies who we
> know
> >    for sure that they have invested a lot in this technology (and
> actively
> > use
> >    it) to help with this effort - e.g. Atlassian has extended Shindig
> >    container & engine to meet their requirements and they definitely have
> > devs
> >    who know the bits and pieces
> >
> > So the question now for me is really simple.  How many of us want to move
> > over to the next phase without getting into any sort of credibility
> issues
> > regarding our choices?  +1 from me.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > I completely understand.  I can't speak to the continued support of
> > vendors
> > > who have adopted Shindig, but I would imagine that they can't just stop
> > > supporting the products consuming Shindig.  I am sorry that this puts
> you
> > > in a tough position but this is a natural cycle of open source
> software.
> > > With no community willing to support and enhance the project there is
> not
> > > much we can do.  If someone takes the code and the project regains life
> > > somewhere else, that is great.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM Ichiro Furusato <
> > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > > >
> > > > While the code is stable and available I can't go to our CIO and
> > > architects
> > > > and
> > > > advocate use of a project as the basis for our online delivery if the
> > > > project has
> > > > folded. We were planning to replace literally five separate legacy
> > > portals
> > > > (that
> > > > have been accumulating like mold rather than serve as replacements)
> > using
> > > > Liferay, with our online widgets being replaced by Open Social
> Gadgets.
> > > > With
> > > > the demise of Shindig I assume Liferay's support of embedded Shindig
> > will
> > > > likely disappear, and therefore my ability to advocate for its use.
> > > >
> > > > It's not the availability of the code, it's the living status of the
> > > > project. If the
> > > > project is dead I can't very well suggest we base millions of dollars
> > of
> > > > online
> > > > delivery over the next 5-10 years on it. As I am responsible for that
> > > > decision
> > > > I could hardly be said to be responsible in advocating for its use at
> > > this
> > > > stage.
> > > >
> > > > Sadly.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Ichiro
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ichiro, while the project will move to the attic, it doesn't mean
> you
> > > > can't
> > > > > continue to use it.  If it is stable enough as it is right now for
> > you
> > > > than
> > > > > you should be able to continue to use it as is.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:59 AM Ichiro Furusato <
> > > > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > To add just one more voice to the chorus, I'm likewise very sad
> to
> > > hear
> > > > > of
> > > > > > the demise of what
> > > > > > seemed (until this notice) to be a functional and mature project.
> > For
> > > > the
> > > > > > past nine months I have
> > > > > > advocated replacing the four (!) existing (legacy) aviation and
> > > > industry
> > > > > > delivery platforms of the
> > > > > > Meteorological Service of New Zealand (MetService) with a
> > > > Liferay/Shindig
> > > > > > based site. Over the
> > > > > > past year we prototyped a replacement service and are currently
> > > > awaiting
> > > > > > the next project
> > > > > > funding cycle. Having to go back to our executive management team
> > and
> > > > > tell
> > > > > > them that the
> > > > > > basic architecture of our proposed service is somewhat
> > embarrassing,
> > > > and
> > > > > we
> > > > > > will likewise now
> > > > > > need to reevaluate and design a new solution. As the lead
> designer
> > I
> > > > have
> > > > > > been quite happy
> > > > > > with the Shindig/Open Social Gadget technology, and we had looked
> > > > forward
> > > > > > to a robust
> > > > > > implementation cycle, replacing fifteen years of crufty service
> > with
> > > a
> > > > > > shiny new Gadget-based
> > > > > > solution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sincere thanks to the development team for an excellent job, very
> > > sorry
> > > > > to
> > > > > > hear about it being
> > > > > > put into the Attic. There may have been inactivity in the dev
> side
> > at
> > > > > > Apache but we were actively
> > > > > > using, and planning to use it for a substantial part of our
> online
> > > > > weather
> > > > > > delivery solution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ichiro
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Ryan Baxter <
> rbaxte...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi fellow Shindig Devs,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to let you all know that the Shindig PMC has voted
> > to
> > > > > > > terminate the Shindig project and move it to the attic.  I have
> > > > already
> > > > > > > informed the Apache board about the termination in this months
> > > board
> > > > > > report
> > > > > > > (below).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As most of you have probably noticed we have seen a decline in
> > > > > > > participation in all aspects of the project over the past
> months
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > downward trend has been happening for over a year now.  This
> can
> > > > > > certainly
> > > > > > > be seen in our reports to the board [1].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If anyone has any questions please let me know, and I will be
> > sure
> > > to
> > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > everyone up to date as we transition the project to the attic.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Ryan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/Board+Reports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > > > > > From: Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > Date: Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:29 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project
> > > > > > > To: bo...@apache.org <javascript:;> <bo...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > Cc: priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;> <
> > priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the Apache
> > > DirectMemory
> > > > > > > project has chosen by vote to recommend moving the project to
> the
> > > > > > >  Attic; and
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer in the best
> > > > > > > interest of the Foundation to continue the Apache Shindig
> project
> > > > > > > due to inactivity;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig
> > > > > > > project is hereby terminated; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is tasked with
> > > > > > > oversight over the software developed by the Apache Shindig
> > > > > > > Project; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Shindig"
> is
> > > > > > > hereby terminated; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig PMC is hereby terminated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chris Spiliotopoulos
> >
> > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter
> > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect>
> >
>



-- 
Chris Spiliotopoulos

Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter
<https://twitter.com/chefArchitect>

Reply via email to