http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 00:53 ------- Subject: Re: SURBL FP on a particular domain name Oops, forgot to change the reply to BZ. > next if ($answer->type ne 'A' && $answer->type ne 'TXT'); > # skip any A record that isn't on 127/8 > next if ($answer->type eq 'A' && $answer->rdatastr !~ /^127\./); > > Shouldn't that prevent what Vance's comment #23 debug log output shows even if > the wrong query's results were associated with a SURBL lookup? How could a > non-127 ip address get passed in to the URIRBL processing? The answer to that Well, trivially from those two lines (if I understand perl expressions well enough) we will fall through with a 'TXT' record containing anything as well as an A record containing '127.' I assume however there will be a further check for TXT records and they will be processed differently. (I personally would have coded that first test with eq's and an || to make it easier to understand, but perhaps perl convention is to use reversed tests.) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
