Hi folks, I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
The remain issues are as follows: http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free to reschedule them. Thanks, Hyunsik On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation. > Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features > of all features that Tajo provide. > > I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved > the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also > need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free > to create new jira. > > Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version. > > Best regards, > Hyunsik > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release. >> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future >> releases. >> Here is my +1. >> >> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will >> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of >> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are >> resolved. >> >> Thanks, >> Jihoon >> >> >> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete >>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there >>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Thanh >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I glanced the change note. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > It looks sufficient to get +1. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks. >>> > >>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi folks, >>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release, >>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and >>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again. >>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo >>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have >>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm >>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very >>> > > interesting news in Apache blog. >>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0 >>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are >>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be >>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which >>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0. >>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule >>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release. >>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea. >>> > > Best regards, >>> > > Hyunsik >>> > >>>
