Thanks Hyunsik. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi folks, > > Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0. > > The current remain issues already are patch available status and all > issues will be committed soon. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340 > > After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate. > > Best regards, > Hyunsik > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > Most of them are patch available. > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think > >> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon. > >> > >> - Hyunsik > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are > >>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for > >>> 0.9.0 release. > >>> > >>> I've described what we need to update in > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if > >>> you guys take and resolve some of them. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Hyunsik > >>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0. > >>>> > >>>> The remain issues are as follows: > >>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F > >>>> > >>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free > >>>> to reschedule them. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Hyunsik > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation. > >>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features > >>>>> of all features that Tajo provide. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved > >>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also > >>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free > >>>>> to create new jira. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to > next version. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> Hyunsik > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release. > >>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them > for future > >>>>>> releases. > >>>>>> Here is my +1. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that > it will > >>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, > each of > >>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that > topic are > >>>>>> resolved. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Jihoon > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <[email protected]>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and > complete > >>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice > if there > >>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sincerely, > >>>>>>> Thanh > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I glanced the change note. > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1. > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > Thanks. > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi < > [email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Hi folks, > >>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For > release, > >>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features > and > >>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that > again. > >>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and > made Tajo > >>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys > have > >>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as > production. I'm > >>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post > very > >>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog. > >>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss > 0.9.0 > >>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 > issues are > >>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them > can be > >>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical > issues which > >>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0. > >>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule > >>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 > release. > >>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea. > >>>>>>> > > Best regards, > >>>>>>> > > Hyunsik > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >
