Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
- Hyunsik On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are > outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for > 0.9.0 release. > > I've described what we need to update in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if > you guys take and resolve some of them. > > Thanks, > Hyunsik > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0. >> >> The remain issues are as follows: >> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F >> >> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free >> to reschedule them. >> >> Thanks, >> Hyunsik >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation. >>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features >>> of all features that Tajo provide. >>> >>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved >>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also >>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free >>> to create new jira. >>> >>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next >>> version. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Hyunsik >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release. >>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future >>>> releases. >>>> Here is my +1. >>>> >>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will >>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of >>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are >>>> resolved. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jihoon >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete >>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if >>>>> there >>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects. >>>>> >>>>> Sincerely, >>>>> Thanh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > I glanced the change note. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Hi folks, >>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release, >>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and >>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again. >>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo >>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have >>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm >>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very >>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog. >>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0 >>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are >>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be >>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which >>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0. >>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule >>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release. >>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea. >>>>> > > Best regards, >>>>> > > Hyunsik >>>>> > >>>>>
