Hi guys, To make maven jars and binary tarball, I've used release plugin. During unit tests, I found some unit test failure, and I just created the jira issue for it. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1111
But, even though I tried to reproduce it many times, I couldn't again. I think that this bug seems to be trivial. It may be a kind of concurrency bug. Nevertheless, we have to fix it before releasing. I'll dig into this problem. I'll continue to prepare the release candidate after I fix this bug. Best regards, Hyunsik On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Azuryy Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Hyunsik. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0. >> >> The current remain issues already are patch available status and all >> issues will be committed soon. >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340 >> >> After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate. >> >> Best regards, >> Hyunsik >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release. >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> > >> > Most of them are patch available. >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think >> >> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon. >> >> >> >> - Hyunsik >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are >> >>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for >> >>> 0.9.0 release. >> >>> >> >>> I've described what we need to update in >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if >> >>> you guys take and resolve some of them. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Hyunsik >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> Hi folks, >> >>>> >> >>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0. >> >>>> >> >>>> The remain issues are as follows: >> >>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F >> >>>> >> >>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free >> >>>> to reschedule them. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Hyunsik >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation. >> >>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features >> >>>>> of all features that Tajo provide. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved >> >>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also >> >>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free >> >>>>> to create new jira. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to >> next version. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>> Hyunsik >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>> Hi guys, >> >>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release. >> >>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them >> for future >> >>>>>> releases. >> >>>>>> Here is my +1. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that >> it will >> >>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, >> each of >> >>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that >> topic are >> >>>>>> resolved. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>> Jihoon >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <[email protected]>: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and >> complete >> >>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice >> if there >> >>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Sincerely, >> >>>>>>> Thanh >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> > I glanced the change note. >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1. >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > Thanks. >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > > Hi folks, >> >>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For >> release, >> >>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features >> and >> >>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that >> again. >> >>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and >> made Tajo >> >>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys >> have >> >>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as >> production. I'm >> >>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post >> very >> >>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog. >> >>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss >> 0.9.0 >> >>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 >> issues are >> >>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them >> can be >> >>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical >> issues which >> >>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0. >> >>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule >> >>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 >> release. >> >>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea. >> >>>>>>> > > Best regards, >> >>>>>>> > > Hyunsik >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> >>
