Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Most of them are patch available. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think > that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon. > > - Hyunsik > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are >> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for >> 0.9.0 release. >> >> I've described what we need to update in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if >> you guys take and resolve some of them. >> >> Thanks, >> Hyunsik >> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0. >>> >>> The remain issues are as follows: >>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F >>> >>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free >>> to reschedule them. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hyunsik >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation. >>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features >>>> of all features that Tajo provide. >>>> >>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved >>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also >>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free >>>> to create new jira. >>>> >>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next >>>> version. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Hyunsik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release. >>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for >>>>> future >>>>> releases. >>>>> Here is my +1. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it >>>>> will >>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of >>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic >>>>> are >>>>> resolved. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jihoon >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete >>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if >>>>>> there >>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>> Thanh >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > I glanced the change note. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thanks. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Hi folks, >>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For >>>>>> > > release, >>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and >>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again. >>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo >>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have >>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm >>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very >>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog. >>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0 >>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are >>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be >>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which >>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0. >>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule >>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release. >>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea. >>>>>> > > Best regards, >>>>>> > > Hyunsik >>>>>> > >>>>>>
