Hi folks,

Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0.

The current remain issues already are patch available status and all
issues will be committed soon.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340

After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate.

Best regards,
Hyunsik


On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> Most of them are patch available.
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
>> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
>>
>> - Hyunsik
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
>>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
>>> 0.9.0 release.
>>>
>>> I've described what we need to update in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
>>> you guys take and resolve some of them.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>>>>
>>>> The remain issues are as follows:
>>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>>>>
>>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
>>>> to reschedule them.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>>>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>>>>> to create new jira.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next 
>>>>> version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for 
>>>>>> future
>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it 
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jihoon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if 
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>> Thanh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > > Hi folks,
>>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For 
>>>>>>> > > release,
>>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues 
>>>>>>> > > which
>>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>>>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>>>>> > > Hyunsik
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to