Hi folks, I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version of Tajo. However, on the version number, I have another idea.
I think that this release involves large changes from various perspectives, such as client API, HBase integration, and so on. So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1. What do you think about it? If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning (0.10.0) and traditional versioning(1.0.0). I hope to hear any opinions from you. Sincerely, Jihoon 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <[email protected]>: > > Hello hyunsik, > > Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be great if we > release next version. > > Thanks and best regards. > Jihun Kang > > > 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>: > > > > +1 I agree > > > > -Jinho > > Best regards > > > > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Hi Hyunsik, > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release. > > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this week. > > > > > > Cheer, > > > Jaehwa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that there are few > > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we can reschedule > > > > them to 0.9.2 release. > > > > > > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the release work soon. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Hyunsik > > > > > > > > > >
