Hi folks, I think that current change is major because many interfaces(TajoClient, StorageManager) are changed.
+1 for 0.10.0 Best regards, Hyoungjun 2014-12-18 1:53 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > In my view, we can easily find out two digit version policy (e.g., > 0.10) in famous open source projects like gnome, scala language, > ubuntu and so on. Therefore, in my opinion, two digit version is not > matter. > > So, I think that we only need to decide whether is a major or minor > change. If it is major, we can use 0.10. Otherwise, we can use 0.9.1. > 1.0 would be not candidate. > > Best regards, > Hyunsik > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > +1 for 0.10.0 > > > > I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hive and > > pig. > > > > Cheers > > Jaehwa > > 2014. 12. 15. 오후 6:45에 "Hyoungjun Kim" <[email protected]>님이 작성: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is unusual > >> version. > >> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1 > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Hyoungjun > >> > >> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > Hyunsik, > >> > I missed my vote. > >> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are > many > >> > real use cases. > >> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0. > >> > > >> > Sincerely, > >> > Jihoon > >> > > >> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > > Hi Jihoon, > >> > > > >> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current > >> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I > didn't > >> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your > >> > > suggestion. > >> > > > >> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a vote > >> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10? > >> > > > >> > > Best regards, > >> > > Hyunsik > >> > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > Hi folks, > >> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version of > >> > Tajo. > >> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea. > >> > > > > >> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from various > >> > > perspectives, > >> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on. > >> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1. > >> > > > What do you think about it? > >> > > > > >> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning > >> > > (0.10.0) > >> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0). > >> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you. > >> > > > > >> > > > Sincerely, > >> > > > Jihoon > >> > > > > >> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Hello hyunsik, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be > great if > >> > we > >> > > >> release next version. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks and best regards. > >> > > >> Jihun Kang > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > +1 I agree > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -Jinho > >> > > >> > Best regards > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik, > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > +1 > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release. > >> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this > week. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Cheer, > >> > > >> > > Jaehwa > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Hi folks, > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that > there > >> are > >> > > few > >> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we can > >> > > reschedule > >> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the release > >> work > >> > > soon. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Best regards, > >> > > >> > > > Hyunsik > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> >
