+1 for 0.10.0 -Jinho Best regards
2014-12-18 2:04 GMT+09:00 Hyoungjun Kim <[email protected]>: > > Hi folks, > I think that current change is major because many interfaces(TajoClient, > StorageManager) are changed. > > +1 for 0.10.0 > > Best regards, > Hyoungjun > > 2014-12-18 1:53 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > > > In my view, we can easily find out two digit version policy (e.g., > > 0.10) in famous open source projects like gnome, scala language, > > ubuntu and so on. Therefore, in my opinion, two digit version is not > > matter. > > > > So, I think that we only need to decide whether is a major or minor > > change. If it is major, we can use 0.10. Otherwise, we can use 0.9.1. > > 1.0 would be not candidate. > > > > Best regards, > > Hyunsik > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > +1 for 0.10.0 > > > > > > I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hive > and > > > pig. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Jaehwa > > > 2014. 12. 15. 오후 6:45에 "Hyoungjun Kim" <[email protected]>님이 작성: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is > unusual > > >> version. > > >> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1 > > >> > > >> Best Regards, > > >> Hyoungjun > > >> > > >> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <[email protected]>: > > >> > > > >> > Hyunsik, > > >> > I missed my vote. > > >> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are > > many > > >> > real use cases. > > >> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0. > > >> > > > >> > Sincerely, > > >> > Jihoon > > >> > > > >> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Jihoon, > > >> > > > > >> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current > > >> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I > > didn't > > >> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your > > >> > > suggestion. > > >> > > > > >> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a > vote > > >> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10? > > >> > > > > >> > > Best regards, > > >> > > Hyunsik > > >> > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected] > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > Hi folks, > > >> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version > of > > >> > Tajo. > > >> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from various > > >> > > perspectives, > > >> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on. > > >> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than > 0.9.1. > > >> > > > What do you think about it? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style > versioning > > >> > > (0.10.0) > > >> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0). > > >> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Sincerely, > > >> > > > Jihoon > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <[email protected]>: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hello hyunsik, > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be > > great if > > >> > we > > >> > > >> release next version. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks and best regards. > > >> > > >> Jihun Kang > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > +1 I agree > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > -Jinho > > >> > > >> > Best regards > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <[email protected] > >: > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik, > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release. > > >> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this > > week. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Cheer, > > >> > > >> > > Jaehwa > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected] > >: > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > Hi folks, > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that > > there > > >> are > > >> > > few > > >> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we > can > > >> > > reschedule > > >> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the > release > > >> work > > >> > > soon. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > Best regards, > > >> > > >> > > > Hyunsik > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
