Hi Jihoon, I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I didn't expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your suggestion.
BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a vote for 0.9.1 vs 0.10? Best regards, Hyunsik On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version of Tajo. > However, on the version number, I have another idea. > > I think that this release involves large changes from various perspectives, > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on. > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1. > What do you think about it? > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning (0.10.0) > and traditional versioning(1.0.0). > I hope to hear any opinions from you. > > Sincerely, > Jihoon > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <[email protected]>: >> >> Hello hyunsik, >> >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be great if we >> release next version. >> >> Thanks and best regards. >> Jihun Kang >> >> >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>: >> > >> > +1 I agree >> > >> > -Jinho >> > Best regards >> > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]>: >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik, >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release. >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this week. >> > > >> > > Cheer, >> > > Jaehwa >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: >> > > > >> > > > Hi folks, >> > > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> > > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that there are few >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we can reschedule >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release. >> > > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the release work soon. >> > > > >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Hyunsik >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
