Hyunsik, I missed my vote. I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are many real use cases. So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0.
Sincerely, Jihoon 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > Hi Jihoon, > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I didn't > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your > suggestion. > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a vote > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10? > > Best regards, > Hyunsik > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version of Tajo. > > However, on the version number, I have another idea. > > > > I think that this release involves large changes from various > perspectives, > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on. > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than 0.9.1. > > What do you think about it? > > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style versioning > (0.10.0) > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0). > > I hope to hear any opinions from you. > > > > Sincerely, > > Jihoon > > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Hello hyunsik, > >> > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be great if we > >> release next version. > >> > >> Thanks and best regards. > >> Jihun Kang > >> > >> > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > +1 I agree > >> > > >> > -Jinho > >> > Best regards > >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]>: > >> > > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik, > >> > > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release. > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this week. > >> > > > >> > > Cheer, > >> > > Jaehwa > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi folks, > >> > > > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > >> > > > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that there are > few > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we can > reschedule > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release. > >> > > > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the release work > soon. > >> > > > > >> > > > Best regards, > >> > > > Hyunsik > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
