I'm happy that you guys consent to go 0.10. Let's go ahead.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for 0.10.0 > > -Jinho > Best regards > > 2014-12-18 2:04 GMT+09:00 Hyoungjun Kim <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi folks, >> I think that current change is major because many interfaces(TajoClient, >> StorageManager) are changed. >> >> +1 for 0.10.0 >> >> Best regards, >> Hyoungjun >> >> 2014-12-18 1:53 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: >> > >> > In my view, we can easily find out two digit version policy (e.g., >> > 0.10) in famous open source projects like gnome, scala language, >> > ubuntu and so on. Therefore, in my opinion, two digit version is not >> > matter. >> > >> > So, I think that we only need to decide whether is a major or minor >> > change. If it is major, we can use 0.10. Otherwise, we can use 0.9.1. >> > 1.0 would be not candidate. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Hyunsik >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > Hi folks, >> > > >> > > +1 for 0.10.0 >> > > >> > > I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hive >> and >> > > pig. >> > > >> > > Cheers >> > > Jaehwa >> > > 2014. 12. 15. 오후 6:45에 "Hyoungjun Kim" <[email protected]>님이 작성: >> > > >> > >> Hi, >> > >> >> > >> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is >> unusual >> > >> version. >> > >> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1 >> > >> >> > >> Best Regards, >> > >> Hyoungjun >> > >> >> > >> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <[email protected]>: >> > >> > >> > >> > Hyunsik, >> > >> > I missed my vote. >> > >> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there are >> > many >> > >> > real use cases. >> > >> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0. >> > >> > >> > >> > Sincerely, >> > >> > Jihoon >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Hi Jihoon, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The current >> > >> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually, I >> > didn't >> > >> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with your >> > >> > > suggestion. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make a >> vote >> > >> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Best regards, >> > >> > > Hyunsik >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected] >> > >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > > Hi folks, >> > >> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a new version >> of >> > >> > Tajo. >> > >> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from various >> > >> > > perspectives, >> > >> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on. >> > >> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather than >> 0.9.1. >> > >> > > > What do you think about it? >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style >> versioning >> > >> > > (0.10.0) >> > >> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0). >> > >> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Sincerely, >> > >> > > > Jihoon >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> Hello hyunsik, >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and it would be >> > great if >> > >> > we >> > >> > > >> release next version. >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> Thanks and best regards. >> > >> > > >> Jihun Kang >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > +1 I agree >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > -Jinho >> > >> > > >> > Best regards >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <[email protected] >> >: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik, >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > +1 >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release. >> > >> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which assigned to me this >> > week. >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Cheer, >> > >> > > >> > > Jaehwa >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected] >> >: >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > Hi folks, >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled to 0.9.1. >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1 release. I think that >> > there >> > >> are >> > >> > > few >> > >> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others look trivial, and we >> can >> > >> > > reschedule >> > >> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release. >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal, I'll start the >> release >> > >> work >> > >> > > soon. >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > Best regards, >> > >> > > >> > > > Hyunsik >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >>
