Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now? Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of type?
Werner On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < [email protected]> wrote: > I see it also as a kind of prototype. > > Viele Grüße > > Oliver > > Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: > >> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to share the >> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>: >> >>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless >>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how >>> it >>> may include/combine it with what we have... >>> Agree? >>> Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan. >>> 2015 um >>> 07:35: >>> >>> > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
