it is since you are not a single team to work on it or if you use an IoC solution.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-23 19:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > actually in a business application is is really _rarely_ wanted ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 19:05, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >t his problem is actually what I am looking for. Not having it is an >> issue for me (in particular when you work with off-shore team). >> >> Would also be awesome to be able to totally inhibit contextual >> behavior - maybe we can I didnt think to it, just meant this is not >> something you always want. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2015-01-23 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>> The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this >> Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static >> methods again basically... >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder >> IMO >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: >>>>> Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration >> for now? >>>>> Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder >> kind of >>>>> type? >>>>> >>>>> Werner >>>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I see it also as a kind of prototype. >>>>>> >>>>>> Viele Grüße >>>>>> >>>>>> Oliver >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >>>>>> >>>>>>> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge >> both to >>>> share the >>>>>>> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> @rmannibucau >>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch >>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it >> should >>>> nevertheless >>>>>>>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step >> figure out if >>>> und how >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> may include/combine it with what we have... >>>>>>>> Agree? >>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> schrieb am >>>> Fr., 23. Jan. >>>>>>>> 2015 um >>>>>>>> 07:35: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> N Oliver B. Fischer >>>>>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >>>>>> P +49 30 44793251 >>>>>> M +49 178 7903538 >>>>>> E [email protected] >>>>>> S oliver.b.fischer >>>>>> J [email protected] >>>>>> X http://xing.to/obf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
