The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static methods again basically...
LieGrue, strub > On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder IMO > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: >> Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now? >> Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of >> type? >> >> Werner >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I see it also as a kind of prototype. >>> >>> Viele Grüße >>> >>> Oliver >>> >>> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >>> >>>> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to > share the >>>> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step. >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch > <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should > nevertheless >>>>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if > und how >>>>> it >>>>> may include/combine it with what we have... >>>>> Agree? >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> schrieb am > Fr., 23. Jan. >>>>> 2015 um >>>>> 07:35: >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> N Oliver B. Fischer >>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >>> P +49 30 44793251 >>> M +49 178 7903538 >>> E [email protected] >>> S oliver.b.fischer >>> J [email protected] >>> X http://xing.to/obf >>> >>> >
