finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now? > Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of > type? > > Werner > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I see it also as a kind of prototype. >> >> Viele Grüße >> >> Oliver >> >> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >> >>> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to share the >>> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step. >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless >>>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how >>>> it >>>> may include/combine it with what we have... >>>> Agree? >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan. >>>> 2015 um >>>> 07:35: >>>> >>>> >> -- >> N Oliver B. Fischer >> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >> P +49 30 44793251 >> M +49 178 7903538 >> E [email protected] >> S oliver.b.fischer >> J [email protected] >> X http://xing.to/obf >> >>
