actually in a business application is is really _rarely_ wanted ;) LieGrue, strub
> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 19:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >t his problem is actually what I am looking for. Not having it is an > issue for me (in particular when you work with off-shore team). > > Would also be awesome to be able to totally inhibit contextual > behavior - maybe we can I didnt think to it, just meant this is not > something you always want. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2015-01-23 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this > Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static > methods again basically... >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder > IMO >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: >>>> Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration > for now? >>>> Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder > kind of >>>> type? >>>> >>>> Werner >>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I see it also as a kind of prototype. >>>>> >>>>> Viele Grüße >>>>> >>>>> Oliver >>>>> >>>>> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >>>>> >>>>>> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge > both to >>> share the >>>>>> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch >>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it > should >>> nevertheless >>>>>>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step > figure out if >>> und how >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> may include/combine it with what we have... >>>>>>> Agree? >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > schrieb am >>> Fr., 23. Jan. >>>>>>> 2015 um >>>>>>> 07:35: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> N Oliver B. Fischer >>>>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >>>>> P +49 30 44793251 >>>>> M +49 178 7903538 >>>>> E [email protected] >>>>> S oliver.b.fischer >>>>> J [email protected] >>>>> X http://xing.to/obf >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
