Hi, You said "User's love may be an argument for commercial success, but not for scientific discussion. "
Science favors measurable differences - if you make arguments please back those up with hard numbers. Otherwise you are just another troll shouting that T5 is shit compared to product x. If you market your solution please explain what it is useful for. If I need ultimate performance I write servlets. If I make ajax enabled complex UI:s I use T5, PrimeFaces or similar. Why your solution is better? We, as developers and software architects, must sell these decisions to our bosses. And you must sell your solution to us. You're not doing a very convincing job right now.. Why would I need to learn yet new language? And why do you compare your product to jsp or struts (http://www.hybridjava.com:8080/, http://www.hybridserverpages.com/), those are very outdated, that does not leave good impression either. World has moved since 2000 you know. If you provide something truly innovative and something that enables people to make more money people will instantly buy it. The only problem is that you have not convinced me that your product is worth buying or using. Prove me wrong, and I'll use it. - Ville -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p3711838.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
