I think that for Tapestry folks (unlike me) it would be very simple to generate jumstart application in the form of a war file that works at once when deployed on jetty that is running from a command line. I will appreciate if someone sends me that war file for my perfomance tests.
Alex On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:10 PM, hj <[email protected]> wrote: > I would do that myself, but did not find the way to start jumpstart in > a normal way - using war file.I see that as a drawback of jumpstart, > but if someone helps me a little bit with running jumpstart with jetty > started in a command line I will appreciate that a lot. > > Alex > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba) > [via Tapestry] <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 04/07/2011 05:31 AM, AlexSerov wrote: >>> Hi Ville ! >>> >>> >>> 9902468 wrote: >>>> Science favors measurable differences - if you make arguments please back >>>> those up with hard numbers. >>> You are absolutely right about numbers. Should I apologize for Tapestry >>> site >>> that misled me a lot - I think I should not. After I received >>> clarifications >>> from Igor and others I immediately concluded that there is no much reasons >>> for Tapestry to bee too slow. Nevertheless I did some measurements once I >>> got some time. >>> >>> I have installed Tapestry, Jetty, OpenEJB and Jumpstart following the >>> instructions. Then I have installed jmeter. I set it for 30 threads 100 >>> seconds for a warm-up and 500 requests from each thread. The request did >>> hit >>> only the first page of Jumpstart - localhost:8080/jumpsatrt/ itself. The >>> numbers are: average response time 130 milliseconds, throughoutput - >>> 130/second. Not bad at all. I ran jetty from eclipse as described in the >>> instruction. >>> >>> To test HybridJava I ported same page into HybridJAva format and generated >>> war file which I installed under jetty and ran jetty from a command line. >>> HybridJava is only about twice faster. >> For a fair comparison, you would need to run both applications under >> jetty from the command line. Having eclipse running in the background >> will only increase load on the machine and skew your numbers. IDE's >> have many background jobs. >> >> Joachim >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> below: >> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4287897.html >> To unsubscribe from Re: HybridJava vs. Tapestry, click here. > -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4289937.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
