On 04/08/2011 03:10 AM, AlexSerov wrote:
I would do that myself, but did not find the way to start jumpstart in
a normal way - using war file.I see that as a drawback of jumpstart,
but if someone helps me a little bit with running jumpstart with jetty
started in a command line I will appreciate that a lot.
Have you tried
ant package
?
Alex
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba)
[via Tapestry]<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:31 AM, AlexSerov wrote:
Hi Ville !
9902468 wrote:
Science favors measurable differences - if you make arguments please back
those up with hard numbers.
You are absolutely right about numbers. Should I apologize for Tapestry
site
that misled me a lot - I think I should not. After I received
clarifications
from Igor and others I immediately concluded that there is no much reasons
for Tapestry to bee too slow. Nevertheless I did some measurements once I
got some time.
I have installed Tapestry, Jetty, OpenEJB and Jumpstart following the
instructions. Then I have installed jmeter. I set it for 30 threads 100
seconds for a warm-up and 500 requests from each thread. The request did
hit
only the first page of Jumpstart - localhost:8080/jumpsatrt/ itself. The
numbers are: average response time 130 milliseconds, throughoutput -
130/second. Not bad at all. I ran jetty from eclipse as described in the
instruction.
To test HybridJava I ported same page into HybridJAva format and generated
war file which I installed under jetty and ran jetty from a command line.
HybridJava is only about twice faster.
For a fair comparison, you would need to run both applications under
jetty from the command line. Having eclipse running in the background
will only increase load on the machine and skew your numbers. IDE's
have many background jobs.
Joachim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4287897.html
To unsubscribe from Re: HybridJava vs. Tapestry, click here.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4289814.html
Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
