I would do that myself, but did not find the way to start jumpstart in a normal way - using war file.I see that as a drawback of jumpstart, but if someone helps me a little bit with running jumpstart with jetty started in a command line I will appreciate that a lot.
Alex On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba) [via Tapestry] <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/07/2011 05:31 AM, AlexSerov wrote: >> Hi Ville ! >> >> >> 9902468 wrote: >>> Science favors measurable differences - if you make arguments please back >>> those up with hard numbers. >> You are absolutely right about numbers. Should I apologize for Tapestry >> site >> that misled me a lot - I think I should not. After I received >> clarifications >> from Igor and others I immediately concluded that there is no much reasons >> for Tapestry to bee too slow. Nevertheless I did some measurements once I >> got some time. >> >> I have installed Tapestry, Jetty, OpenEJB and Jumpstart following the >> instructions. Then I have installed jmeter. I set it for 30 threads 100 >> seconds for a warm-up and 500 requests from each thread. The request did >> hit >> only the first page of Jumpstart - localhost:8080/jumpsatrt/ itself. The >> numbers are: average response time 130 milliseconds, throughoutput - >> 130/second. Not bad at all. I ran jetty from eclipse as described in the >> instruction. >> >> To test HybridJava I ported same page into HybridJAva format and generated >> war file which I installed under jetty and ran jetty from a command line. >> HybridJava is only about twice faster. > For a fair comparison, you would need to run both applications under > jetty from the command line. Having eclipse running in the background > will only increase load on the machine and skew your numbers. IDE's > have many background jobs. > > Joachim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4287897.html > To unsubscribe from Re: HybridJava vs. Tapestry, click here. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4289814.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
