A good advice, tank you! The ant build so far not quite successful though. See the log attached please.
Alex On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba) [via Tapestry] <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/08/2011 03:10 AM, AlexSerov wrote: >> I would do that myself, but did not find the way to start jumpstart in >> a normal way - using war file.I see that as a drawback of jumpstart, >> but if someone helps me a little bit with running jumpstart with jetty >> started in a command line I will appreciate that a lot. > Have you tried > ant package > ? > > >> Alex >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba) >> [via Tapestry]<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> On 04/07/2011 05:31 AM, AlexSerov wrote: >>>> Hi Ville ! >>>> >>>> >>>> 9902468 wrote: >>>>> Science favors measurable differences - if you make arguments please >>>>> back >>>>> those up with hard numbers. >>>> You are absolutely right about numbers. Should I apologize for Tapestry >>>> site >>>> that misled me a lot - I think I should not. After I received >>>> clarifications >>>> from Igor and others I immediately concluded that there is no much >>>> reasons >>>> for Tapestry to bee too slow. Nevertheless I did some measurements once >>>> I >>>> got some time. >>>> >>>> I have installed Tapestry, Jetty, OpenEJB and Jumpstart following the >>>> instructions. Then I have installed jmeter. I set it for 30 threads 100 >>>> seconds for a warm-up and 500 requests from each thread. The request did >>>> hit >>>> only the first page of Jumpstart - localhost:8080/jumpsatrt/ itself. The >>>> numbers are: average response time 130 milliseconds, throughoutput - >>>> 130/second. Not bad at all. I ran jetty from eclipse as described in the >>>> instruction. >>>> >>>> To test HybridJava I ported same page into HybridJAva format and >>>> generated >>>> war file which I installed under jetty and ran jetty from a command >>>> line. >>>> HybridJava is only about twice faster. >>> For a fair comparison, you would need to run both applications under >>> jetty from the command line. Having eclipse running in the background >>> will only increase load on the machine and skew your numbers. IDE's >>> have many background jobs. >>> >>> Joachim >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >>> below: >>> >>> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4287897.html >>> To unsubscribe from Re: HybridJava vs. Tapestry, click here. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4289814.html >> Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4290450.html > To unsubscribe from Re: HybridJava vs. Tapestry, click here. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Re-HybridJava-vs-Tapestry-tp3555989p4291170.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
