Hi, Ted — I think we should get that work into the next release. Thus, if you need more time (reasonable amount), then I say we delay accordingly.
NOTE: The Gremlin-Python stuff will not get into the next release. It has gotten really complex/powerful and is currently 100+ commits ahead of master/ ! :) .. As such, given the gargantuan undertaking, we will save this work for a future release. Thanks, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would like to get TinkerPop-1254 in before code freeze. Shooting for > finishing it up by end of this week but I'll drop a note if it looks like I > won't make it. > > --Ted > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It's end of June - time to start firming up for release. We have a number >> of outstanding PRs that need votes/merge. Perhaps we try to get those all >> in this week and begin code freeze next Monday (7/4)? >> >> I think we'll have to postpone the GLV work with gremlin-python for this >> release. There's just too much left to do to get that in "right". Are there >> any other open issues of importance? >> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, end of June-ish is best for me as I have few things on my plate the >>> first half of this month. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marko. >>> >>> http://markorodriguez.com >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:46 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> We didn't really discuss a date for release on this thread. I was >>> thinking >>>> that we could start looking at the week of July 4th as the target week >>> for >>>> VOTE and nail down a date as we get closer. >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to >>> have >>>>> the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin. >>>>> >>>>> I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects >>>>> (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache >> in >>>>> their distributables, so maybe we can just do: >>>>> >>>>> tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip >>>>> tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette < >> spmalle...@gmail.com >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard >> apache >>>>>> releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would have >>>>>> burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to >>> change >>>>>> it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be? >>>>>> >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> or the full business: >>>>>> >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so bad >> to >>> me >>>>>> anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez < >>> okramma...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in >>>>> master/ >>>>>>> (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of >> internal >>>>>>> changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :| >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be >>>>> named >>>>>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's >>>>>>>> something that should be done along with this release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source code >>>>>> which >>>>>>> is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other >> distributions >>>>> are >>>>>>> gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those >>>>>> naming >>>>>>> conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed. >>>>> Thus, >>>>>> I >>>>>>> think the naming of our artifacts is correct. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Marko. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://markorodriguez.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be >>>>> named >>>>>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's >>>>>>>> something that should be done along with this release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Jason >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette < >>>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing >> the >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out >> on >>>>> an >>>>>>>>>> upcoming release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --Ted >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder < >> velo...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the >> artifactId >>>>> as >>>>>>>>> well >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < >>>>>>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" >> is >>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future >> releases. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < >>>>>>>>>> jbmu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases >> look >>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow >>>>> made >>>>>>>>>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were >>>>> not. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < >>>>>>>>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and >> 3.2.1 >>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to >> do >>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" >>>>>>>>>>>>> distributions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
