We didn't really discuss a date for release on this thread. I was thinking
that we could start looking at the week of July 4th as the target week for
VOTE and nail down a date as we get closer.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to have
> the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin.
>
> I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects
> (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache in
> their distributables, so maybe we can just do:
>
> tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip
> tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard apache
> > releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would have
> > burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to change
> > it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be?
> >
> > apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip
> > apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip
> >
> > or the full business:
> >
> > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip
> > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip
> >
> > i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so bad to me
> > anymore.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in
> master/
> > > (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of internal
> > > changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :|
> > >
> > > > Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be
> named
> > > > apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's
> > > > something that should be done along with this release.
> > >
> > > There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source code
> > which
> > > is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other distributions
> are
> > > gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those
> > naming
> > > conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed.
> Thus,
> > I
> > > think the naming of our artifacts is correct.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Marko.
> > >
> > > http://markorodriguez.com
> > >
> > > On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be
> named
> > > > apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's
> > > > something that should be done along with this release.
> > > >
> > > > -- Jason
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I think a release sounds good.  I'd be interested in witnessing the
> > the
> > > >>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on
> an
> > > >>> upcoming release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --Ted
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId
> as
> > > >> well
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette <
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is
> > just
> > > >>> in
> > > >>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <
> > > >>> [email protected]>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look
> > > >> more
> > > >>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow
> made
> > > >>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were
> not.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette <
> > > >>>> [email protected]
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1
> > > >>> and I
> > > >>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do
> a
> > > >>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current"
> > > >>>>>> distributions
> > > >>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to