Yes, end of June-ish is best for me as I have few things on my plate the first half of this month.
Thanks, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:46 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > > We didn't really discuss a date for release on this thread. I was thinking > that we could start looking at the week of July 4th as the target week for > VOTE and nail down a date as we get closer. > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to have >> the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin. >> >> I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects >> (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache in >> their distributables, so maybe we can just do: >> >> tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip >> tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip >> >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard apache >>> releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would have >>> burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to change >>> it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be? >>> >>> apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip >>> apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip >>> >>> or the full business: >>> >>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip >>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip >>> >>> i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so bad to me >>> anymore. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in >> master/ >>>> (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of internal >>>> changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :| >>>> >>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be >> named >>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's >>>>> something that should be done along with this release. >>>> >>>> There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source code >>> which >>>> is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other distributions >> are >>>> gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those >>> naming >>>> conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed. >> Thus, >>> I >>>> think the naming of our artifacts is correct. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Marko. >>>> >>>> http://markorodriguez.com >>>> >>>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be >> named >>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's >>>>> something that should be done along with this release. >>>>> >>>>> -- Jason >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette < >>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the >>> the >>>>>>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on >> an >>>>>>> upcoming release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Ted >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected] >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId >> as >>>>>> well >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is >>> just >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look >>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow >> made >>>>>>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were >> not. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1 >>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do >> a >>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" >>>>>>>>>> distributions >>>>>>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
